Follow MyPFJourney
Hello and Welcome!
My name is Jacob, a husband to a wine-blogger wife, father to two bouncy-boy toddlers, and I'm the owner/author of My Personal Finance Journey. By day, I am a scientist working in bio-pharmaceutical development. Personal finance has been my hobby since 2007 when I started teaching myself through books (that finance B.S. degree didn't teach me much!). Learning how to save, adopt a frugal mindset, and invest my own money soundly has allowed me to have a savings rate > 50%, increase my net worth by > 20 times, grow my career, and always do what I love. Check out the About Me page to learn more!
In previous posts, I have covered the following topics related to mortgage payments and asset allocation:
However, in these posts, I did not include exactly how the mortgage payments (and resulting home equity that is built) should fit in to your overall asset allocation target/strategy. This will be the subject of today’s posting.
To try to shed some light on this topic, let’s first see what the financial advisors do to handle this question. We will then see how we need to adapt their strategy since we have no restrictions with what we do.
How do financial professionals handle the asset allocation strategy with home equity?
Through an examination of the opinions of the financial press (see three links below), I discovered that there are basically three “camps” when it comes to opinions on how home equity should be treated when it comes to figuring out your overall asset allocation.
1) Not including home equity in the target asset allocation percentages at all.
This approach is generally taken because real estate values/equity are difficult to determine exactly and because most of the time, it is not possible to adjust your allocation %’s in real estate because you cannot simply leave a house for another one.
2) Not including home equityย in asset allocation percentagesย unlessย it isย an investment property (soย not includingย including your primary residence).
This approach of excluding your primary residence from your asset allocation decision making is taken because of the fact that you NEEDย a place to live, and you cannot simply exchange your home for shares of a mutual fund if your allocation %’s change.
3) Include all residences, investment properties, and REIT investmentsย as a “real estate” category in your asset allocation strategy.
This approach is generally taken to have a conservative strategy that ensures that all assets are captured. However, since it is a little harder to follow, it is generally the least popular strategy.
MyMoneyBlog – Home Equity in Asset Allocation
BusinessWeek.com – Home Equity in Asset Allocation?
Investment News – Including Home Equity in Asset Allocation
Which approach will I take?
I believe that for my needs, situation, and investment style, I am going to choose to follow Approach #1 – not including my future home equity in the property I am planning to purchase this fall –ย with a slight adjustment.
Why is this exactly?
In short, home equity in a single house cannot be considered exposure to real estate because it is not diversified enough.
A passage on pages 282-285 of one of my favorite asset allocation books titled, “What Wall Street Doesn’t Want You to Know,” by Larry Swedroe does a great job of breaking this down in to terms the layperson can understand.
In the book, Swedroe describes that your home is clearly real estate.
However, it is very undiversified real estate in the following ways:
So, because the home you live in is very undiversified and have trust deeds associated with it, counting it towards the real estate portion of your overall asset allocation would be as foolish as a Pfizer executiveย counting a large quantity ofย Pfizer stock as their sole exposure to large capย US asset class. They are really not diversified one bit.
Sinceย owning even one share of anย indexย real estate investment mutual fund, such as a REIT that Vanguard, gives you broad exposure to all types of real estate across many different regions, this should be the route that is chosen to represent the real estate portion of your asset allocation picture.
So, how will I treat/consider my home purchase since I am not including it in my asset allocation mix?
Just to recap – in my mind, I want to purchase a home vs. rent one for the following reasons:
On a similar note, I would want to invest in additionalย real estateย properties to take advantage of tax benefits of home ownership, such as being excludedย from paying capital gains on profit from selling the propertyย (described in previous post at link above).
Given the considerations above, here’s the way I will treat home equity:
So, I hope this investigation/discussion helps guide you through some of the tough decisions you will have to make regarding how you will treat home ownership. As always, please let me know if you have any questions.
Keep on learning!
Jacob
To receive updates on topics such as this one as soon as they are published, click on the link below to subscribe to My Money Blog:
Hi folks! My name is Jacob. I am the owner and operator of My Personal Finance Journey. I started this blog in January of 2010 and have enjoyed the journey ever since. Since finishing up graduate school in Virginia in 2014, I have been working in biopharmaceutical development in Colorado. You can read more about me and this site hereโ. Please contact me if you have any questions!
Maximizing Your Nest Egg: How to Make the Most of IRA Investments
5 Ways To Start Investing With Less Than $1,000
What Are the Golden Rules for Investing in Gold?
Gold Investments for IRA Accounts
How You Could Be Saving 33 Percent More This Year
Session expired
Please log in again. The login page will open in a new tab. After logging in you can close it and return to this page.
I am considering this topic for myself, and I find the reasons you cite to leave your home off your allocation unpersuasive. Most particularly in your discussion of your home as undiversified, and susceptible to major losses of wealth, wouldn’t you want to account for that? You’re taking a risk, and if you’re home goes down in value you are losing real wealth. Shouldn’t your strategy, allocations and stock investments account for that?
Thanks for reading Juggalo! I'll admit that this isn't a completely straightforward topic.
First, I believe that you are correct in that having your home go down in value is not something that should be taken lightly.
But, the trouble in incorporating a single home in to my asset allocation is that it is not the same type of diversified asset as the other components of my portfolio (index mutual funds). If one of my index mutual fund classes goes down, I would simply buy more.
On the other hand, if your home goes down in value (or up in value), what can you do? You can't buy or sell more really. I suppose that if your home decreased in value, you could buy more REIT shares, but your home and a REIT (in my mind) are almost not the same asset class. REITs represent thousands of real estate properties across the country. If you home increased in value, I suppose you could also sell REIT shares, but in my mind, that takes away your exposure to the COMPLETE real estate market and upside potential there.
Overall, I think that since my investing strategy uses index funds and not individual stocks, I think of it slightly different. I'd be interested in hearing your take on this again! Thanks for reading!
My recent post $141.20 Giveaway – Community and Charity 10% Monthly Blog Income Give Back # 5 – February 2012 Edition