Follow MyPFJourney
Hello and Welcome!
My name is Jacob, a husband to a wine-blogger wife, father to two bouncy-boy toddlers, and I'm the owner/author of My Personal Finance Journey. By day, I am a scientist working in bio-pharmaceutical development. Personal finance has been my hobby since 2007 when I started teaching myself through books (that finance B.S. degree didn't teach me much!). Learning how to save, adopt a frugal mindset, and invest my own money soundly has allowed me to have a savings rate > 50%, increase my net worth by > 20 times, grow my career, and always do what I love. Check out the About Me page to learn more!
Personally, one of my least favorite things to discuss, especially in an election year like this one, is who is right and who is wrong between the various political parties in the US.
Why is this? Simple – because it is almost a lost cause to get someone to change their mind about their beliefs in this area. As such, these conversations usually just turn in to arguments for the sake of arguing, which I am not a big fan of. In my book, everyone is entitled to their own opinion, and that is fine by me!
However, one of the things I do enjoy researching and sharing are the various financial differences between Democrats and Republicans based on available data.Â
For example, in Jeremy Siegel’s book, Stocks for the Long Run, his team analyzed the various returns of the stock market when Republicans vs. Democrats held the Presidency and found that from 1948-2001, the annualized real return for when Democrats were in office was almost 5% higher than for Republicans. This was fairly surprising to me since Republicans are often generalized in the financial media as being the party that is more interested in the success of private industry.
As a continuation of the Democrats vs. Republicans financial comparison, today, I wanted to try to seek an answer to the following two questions based on available data:
Based on the general impression given by the financial and political party campaign media, I would guess that Republicans, on average, have more personal wealth and are better at creating wealth in the US than Democrats.
Starting at the top sounds like a good place for us to begin our numerical investigation. In other words, the first thing I looked for was a listing of the political affiliations of the top 20 richest people in the US, based on the Forbes Richest Person in the World listing.
Luckily, a study in 2011 by the New American Gazette had already analyzed this data exactly the way I was wanting to.
What they found was that 75% of the top 20 richest people in America support the Democratic party. Even George Soros, a stock market financier, was listed as being a Democrat. In fact, Bill Gates, Warren Buffet, Larry Ellison (the top 3 wealthiest on the list), and the two Google principals were all associated with the Democratic Party. This was rather surprising to me!
Moving down the ranks of richest people in America (now to the tens to hundreds of million Dollar net worth level), the next groups that we come to where political affiliation is very easy to identify are individual members of the House of Representatives and the Senate. By now, I’m sure we’re all fairly well aware that nearly every member (regardless of political party) in Congress is wealthy and a millionaire.
Does anyone remember 2011? It seemed like you couldn’t even turn on the TV or bring up a web browser without hearing about the infamous 1% protests, etc. I even got to see the 1% protest / Occupy Wall Street camp in the heart of New York City during my girlfriend’s ING New York Marathon in November!
According to a 2011 Gallop Poll, the wealthiest 1% of the US population is defined as earning an annual income of $500,000 or more. The results of this study showed that the largest percentage (41%) of the 1%’ers identify themselves as “Moderates/Independents.” However, when it comes to voting, a majority (57%) tend to lean/vote Republican.
When it comes to determining if more normal-income earning Democrats or Republicans are more wealthy, the conclusions become VERY complicated, but rather interesting!
Listed below is a summary of what I found in digging around the Internet:
At this point, we have a little bit of disparity on our hands. Or, at the very least, these results seem rather confusing. On one hand, we have that across the entire US population, richer voters tend to pitch their ballot for Republicans. However, geographic areas where on average, there are wealthier people are Democrat. At this point, you may be asking – what is the reason for this? Or furthermore, is this even possible?
From the paradoxical reasons mentioned above, an interesting question presents itself: are these wealthy locations wealthy because they are Democrat, or do locations already with high concentrations of wealth just tend to vote more majority Democrat? In other words, is being Democrat the cause, or the effect of high concentrations of wealth/high income earners in an area?
In terms of more measurable quantities, (if we investigate the ’cause’ route) the question might become – are Democrats more effective than Republicans at increasing average income levels and Gross Domestic Product (GDP)? Â
Listed below is a summary of the various results I found relating to this question:
From this data, it seems that Democrats are more effective at creating wealth, at least at the country-wide level, than Republicans.
Since all of this can get a little convoluted, let’s summarize the key things we found from this investigation:
Another key takeaway for me from this post is that I now do not believe either party can be universally called “the party of the wealthy” or “the party of low-income earners,” since there clearly are very wealthy and not-as-wealthy people on both side of the political party aisle.
Hi folks! My name is Jacob. I am the owner and operator of My Personal Finance Journey. I started this blog in January of 2010 and have enjoyed the journey ever since. Since finishing up graduate school in Virginia in 2014, I have been working in biopharmaceutical development in Colorado. You can read more about me and this site here​. Please contact me if you have any questions!
Maximizing Your Nest Egg: How to Make the Most of IRA Investments
Lifetime Income Strategies: Leveraging Annuities for a Comfortable Retirement
Three Tax Strategies to Consider Before Selling an Investment Property
4 Dumb Mistakes Smart People Make with Their Money
The F.I.R.E. Movement: Is It the Financial Strategy for You?
Session expired
Please log in again. The login page will open in a new tab. After logging in you can close it and return to this page.
Why switch from evaluating states wealth to evaluating national economic policy? Why not evaluate how states grew under various leadership? It seems like you would have a little more stability there as states don’t oscillate every 4 to 8 years.
Interesting article, but I have a question. I’d like to know which party is actually most responsible for growth in the economy. Just because the growth appears during one party’s term in office does not necessarily mean that party is responsible for it. Democrats could be inheriting the rewards of legislation and policies enacted during prior Republican-led terms. Which is it? Does anyone have the definitive answer to this?
Very well done, however another key thing you did not address, ( which you may have in more recent posts I have yet to read ), is how do rich Democrats vs. rich Republicans make their wealth. For example most Democrats in congress, (House and Senate), gained the majority of their wealth during their tenure in congress, by being exempt from laws such as, Insider Trading, as well as manipulating laws and bills toward their and their rich supporters personal financial benefit, (i.e. Solindra bail out and many more examples to numerous to mention at this time). By contrast, most, rich Republicans in congress make the majority of their money before entering congress, in the private sector, and few, (by comparison), benefit personally in any substantial way, from the bills they pass.
Thanks for reading ? everything!
I actually haven't looked in to that aspect, so I can't comment either way. Thanks for sharing your thoughts though! I'd be interested to hear other's take on that aspect as well!
My recent post Reader Profile – Jenny from Frugal Guru Guide
interesting finds jacob – I think that of one of the key things that you forgot to look at was how the wealth was held. Lots of people I know vote republican and would be considered “wealthy” by most surveys, but they dont have that much cash – they own vast amounts of lands (we are talking in the tens of thousands of acres) and use that to make a living – which they normally dont generate that much actual cash for.