Follow MyPFJourney
Hello and Welcome!
My name is Jacob, a husband to a wine-blogger wife, father to two bouncy-boy toddlers, and I'm the owner/author of My Personal Finance Journey. By day, I am a scientist working in bio-pharmaceutical development. Personal finance has been my hobby since 2007 when I started teaching myself through books (that finance B.S. degree didn't teach me much!). Learning how to save, adopt a frugal mindset, and invest my own money soundly has allowed me to have a savings rate > 50%, increase my net worth by > 20 times, grow my career, and always do what I love. Check out the About Me page to learn more!
————————————————————————————————————————
Welcome to My Personal Finance Journey! If you are new here, please read the “About” or “First-Time Visitor” pages to find out more about us. If you would like to receive free updates on articles like this by email, then sign up here or you can subscribe to the RSS feed. Also, check us out on Twitter or Facebook. Thanks for visiting! Keep on learning!
————————————————————————————————————————
For the past few years since finishing college, I have been somewhat bad in regard that I have been aggressively, but blindly, saving for the future/retirement.
What I mean by this is that I have been so focused on the input of saving money for retirement that I forgot to consider how the output would be affected when I went to withdraw those funds.
However, the good news is that the past month, I have been doing a lot of analysis of my current investment allocation location, learning about the withdrawal treatment rules of the accounts in which my funds are in, as well as learning about new options available to me to improve location distribution of my assets.
Going along with this effort to learn more about optimized location distribution of my retirement investments, I recently read the book, The New Three-Legged Stool: A Tax-Efficient Approach to Retirement Planning, by CFP and retirement planning specialist, Rick Rodgers.
If this is the first time you are hearing about the NEW Three-Legged Stool for Retirement (the old Three-Legged Stool, which consisted of Social Security and Pensions is no longer relevant, so we’ll ignore that for now), it is a retirement planning concept that employs utilizing ALL three different types of investment accounts/locations (based on their tax treatment) shown below, in an effort to more efficiently prepare yourself financially for retirement:
Rodgers introduces a concept called the R/D Factor as a way to take withdrawals from these different accounts during retirement in a tax-efficient manner. In a nutshell, he advises that an efficient way to fund your retirement is to:
I really liked the idea behind this because in my experience, it’s always nice to have various options available to you when it comes to finances because you never know what the future will bring with tax law changes, etc.
However, one important question that was not expressly covered in the book is, “When you are saving for retirement, how much of your investments should be distributed in tax-free, after tax/taxable, and tax-deferred accounts, respectively?”
In searching around the Internet and reading through several of the investing strategy books I have accumulated the past few years, it seems that detailed guidance to this question is quite hard to find, although there was some good loose guidance on one Bogleheads thread I read based on other people’s asset distribution.
In an effort to seek out some sort of answer to this question, I emailed Rick Rodgers directly. Essentially, what he recommends for his clients varies on a person-to-person basis. However, the distribution decision is generally based on the person’s marginal tax bracket being at or above the 25% cutoff, or if it is lower. If you’re not sure about what the tax brackets look like based on taxable income levels (note this is different than gross income or Adjusted Gross Income), take a look at this really good page that Mike Piper over at Oblivious Investor put together – Tax Brackets 2013.
To give us a starting point, listed below are the base/lowest taxable incomes that would qualify someone to start having to pay 25% income taxes, split up based on filing status. If you can get your taxable income $1 below these amounts, you will be in the the 15% tax bracket, so a pretty nice decrease!
From here, let’s dig a little deeper to try to develop some real-life guidelines for how this rule of thumb would affect asset location distribution between the three “legs” discussed above:
The first possibility that we run in to in developing a set of working asset distribution guidelines is the case where someone is ABSOLUTELY certain that he or she will be in the 15% or lower marginal tax bracket.
To illustrate this situation with a few possible scenarios, this could be someone who files singly and only makes $35,000 per year in GROSS income, or if a young married couple was filing jointly and only one member of the family worked at a starting job out of college that earned $60,000 per year.
In this case, since you are in perhaps lowest tax bracket, you want to take advantage of the situation and pay taxes now instead of paying them during retirement. In Three-Legged Stool retirement language, you would want to emphasize tax-free and after-tax/taxable accounts.
To execute upon this strategy if I knew I was going to be in the 15% or lower tax bracket no matter what, I would take the following approach:
On the opposite end of the spectrum from the group of folks discussed above, we need to develop some general guidelines for higher-income earners that, despite the introduction of any amount of deductions they can reasonable execute, cannot reduce their overall taxable income below the 25% tax bracket income limits.
In this case, since you are in a medium-to-high tax bracket, you want to take advantage of the situation by deferring the payment of taxes until later when you can give yourself a chance at being in a lower tax bracket. In Three-Legged Stool retirement language, you would want to max out tax-deferred accounts and only start contributing excess amounts to after-tax and tax-free accounts once your tax-deferral options have been satisfied.
To execute upon this strategy if I knew I was going to be in the 25% or higher tax bracket no matter what, I would take the following approach:
In between the two groups discussed above of higher income earners (definitely in the 25% tax bracket or above) and earners in the 10-15% tax bracket, we have a fascinating group that is sort of “on a fiscal fence.” What makes them special is that they are looking at a significant decrease in taxes if they can get to their taxable income decreased slightly (through tax deductions) to the realm of the 15% tax bracket.
In terms of the investment accounts we’re discussing here, I will estimate that being “within reach” of the 15% tax bracket is having a currently-estimated taxable income of $5,000-$10,000 more than the income limits described above for the break between tax brackets (so $36,251 + $5-10k for single filers and $72,501 + $5-10k for joint filers).
In this case, since you are within striking distance of entering the lowest tax bracket, you want to take advantage of the situation reduce your taxable income so you qualify for the lower tax level! In Three-Legged Stool retirement language, you would want to first emphasize tax-deferred accounts until you enter the 15% tax bracket, then switch to focusing solely on tax-free and after-tax/taxable accounts for the rest of the year.
To execute upon this strategy if I knew I was within reach of the 15% tax bracket, I would take the following approach:
In an ideal world, investors would naturally pass through the different tax bracket stages discussed above as they progress in their career.
For example, a 22 year old that has just graduated from college and beginning their career will likely have a lower income. Thus, this person would focus their investing during their 20’s in tax-free Roth and after-tax accounts. Then, when they are older and their income has gone up, they will scale back their tax-free investing to focus on building their tax-deferred base, throwing their remaining savings in to taxable accounts. The goal of this flow is to allow the tax-free/taxable accounts to compound longer to give them a chance to naturally be on par with the tax-deferred asset base. In this way, you naturally achieve the target 1/3 / 1/3 / 1/3 split of your assets among the three account types by the time you hit retirement.
This is how the Three-Legged Stool approach would work in an ideal world.
However, in the real world, I don’t think it often happens that way. People make mistakes, perhaps investing too heavily in tax-deferred accounts (or not saving/investing any money at all because funds are tight and they are not wise with finances yet) in their early, low income days. Before you know it, you have been working for 10 years and are making over $100,000 per year. What happens then? Do you just forget about having any tax-free income during retirement because you missed your window at a lower tax bracket when you are younger to focus solely on tax-deferred investing?
Because mistakes are a part of life, there is likely to be a very unbalanced Three-Legged Stool if you aren’t proactive in monitoring your asset distribution levels.
Since there are no set % guidelines for what your specific distribution should look like prior to retirement, you will have to use some person discretion here. However, I honestly believe that people are intelligent, and simply by actively calculating your distribution each year or month, you will be able to gauge whether corrective actions need to be taken so that you gain a more ideal distribution for retirement.
To illustrate how this tracking/corrective action process would potentially work, let’s consider a fictional 40 year old man named Bob. In the early part of his career, Bob was not very fiscally responsible with saving money in a Roth IRA and/or taxable accounts to take advantage of his low tax bracket.
He now makes $150,000 per year, putting him above the 15% tax bracket. In calculating his investment distribution among the three Legs, he sees that he has the following breakdown of assets: 5% in tax-free accounts, 40% in after-tax accounts, and 55% in tax-deferred accounts. From the investment distribution rules set forth above for people above the 15% tax bracket, Bob should technically be focusing his current investing in tax-deferred accounts. However, since he has such an imbalance in that his tax-free accounts are so low compared to the others, he would want to sacrifice some current tax savings to execute a backdoor Roth IRA conversion contribution in order for him to have some tax-free income to tap during retirement.
Overall, just be sure to remember that you should be getting closer and closer to achieving a 1/3 balance between all three legs as you get within say 3-5 years or so of retirement age!
As I mentioned above and previous posts, regardless of if you’re in a high or low current tax bracket, you don’t want to go too crazy contributing to retirement accounts (where the money is locked up until you reach 59.5 years old) unless you feel comfortable you have enough money saved up in after-tax accounts first. This would be money that could be accessible if an emergency, planned expense, or other opportunity came up in the future.
In short, don’t underestimate the power of having accessible money when putting together your Three-Legged Stool.
Truthfully, I was quite surprised when I calculated these percentages since even though there is some imbalance, I have pretty good representation in all three Legs. However, as I suspected/mentioned in my post about blindly saving for retirement, it does appear that the tax-deferred (401k/rollover IRA) bucket is the largest percentage of the three.
Nevertheless, it is clear in looking at these percentages that I have some room to improve in building up the tax-free account while I am in graduate school and WELL inside the 15% tax bracket, as I shared in my 2012 taxes review post the other day where I calculated that I only paid 14.6% of my overall income total taxes last year.
In an attempt to figure out a path forward for me, let’s take a look at the action steps I listed out for folks in the 15% tax bracket above:
How about you all? Approximately what percentage of your investments are currently held in tax-free, after-tax, and tax-deferred accounts?
Do you think that you will be able to reach the 33% 3-way split target recommended by the time you reach retirement between the three Legs?
Share your experiences by commenting below!
***Photo courtesy of http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/09/Liberty_-_Stool_Thebes_-_1884.jpg
Hi folks! My name is Jacob. I am the owner and operator of My Personal Finance Journey. I started this blog in January of 2010 and have enjoyed the journey ever since. Since finishing up graduate school in Virginia in 2014, I have been working in biopharmaceutical development in Colorado. You can read more about me and this site here. Please contact me if you have any questions!
Maximizing Your Nest Egg: How to Make the Most of IRA Investments
Unlocking the Power of Tax Refund Loans: Accelerating Financial Growth with Smart Borrowing
Conversations to Have Before Your Child Goes to College
Is Your Employer’s Group Life Insurance Enough?
Three Tax Strategies to Consider Before Selling an Investment Property
Session expired
Please log in again. The login page will open in a new tab. After logging in you can close it and return to this page.
Thank you for this comprehensive post. I surfed over looking for a review of 3 Stool and any objective retirement planning advice. Your post is incredibly helpful. I will read it several times. I have personally accumulated ok but planning lacks. Thank you again!
Glad it helped David! What current allocation among the 3 legs do you carry?
Jacob A Irwin recently posted…Is Emergency Roadside Assistance Worth The Cost?
Hi Jacob: odd but I have built up all three legs but have no grasp on whether they will hold-up my “retirement rear-end” when and if I get lucky enough to sit on it. So, I have requested the book you based your journey on from the library, committed to reading it, your blog then setting my own path as opposed to wandering. I will keep you posted, and thanks again, seriously good deed(s) you have done.
P.S. Forgot answer your question ” What current allocation among the 3 legs do you carry?” I am pretty certain it’s something like:
Leg # 1 -Tax-Deferred Accounts (IRA, SEP IRA, Traditional IRA, Rollover IRA, Traditional 401(k), Annuities) 85%
Leg # 2 – After Tax Accounts (taxable accounts – not tax-advantaged, including municipal bonds since income from that does increase your gross income, although that specific income is generally not taxed) 1%
Leg # 3 – Tax-Free Accounts (Roth IRA, Roth 401k, cash-value life insurance) 14%
I have some assets in “regular” investment and savings accounts as well but I am not sure as of this post which leg this holds-up if any. I thought “after tax account” but since I am not sure I did not include it in the above percentages.
I will update as I read and learn on with more accurate information. One thought I had for others about finance that has stuck with me for years: “it’s not what you make it’s what you spend.” I always thought this to be a good guide in some ways even if one is anticipating retirement soon (I am not), as the less you will need to spend in your retirement the longer your retirement funds will last.
Simple concept yet entirely doable for many. A good example is I am obtaining the book you based your journey on from my local public library as opposed to Amazon.com or elsewhere. Now I have that money to a) spend on something I enjoy or b) contribute to a savings vehicle.
You have probably covered this concept elsewhere but maybe someone stumbles over this page/comment and it helps.
Thanks for sharing those details David!
Sounds like your regular investments/accounts would count as after-tax in terms of the 3 legged stool.
I would also recommend focusing on building up a little more equity in your tax-free and after-tax legs. By doing that, you can reduce your taxable, ordinary income during retirement so you don’t pay as much in taxes.
Jacob A Irwin recently posted…How A “Fixer-Upper” House Can Turn Into A Nightmare
This is quite the mega-post! Last year I began to see how leveraging my taxable accounts might not be such a bad thing if I truly plan to retire early. As you said: It is not good to lock up all your savings in accounts that you can't access until age 59-1/2 (and a 72T isn't yield very much in case you go that route). Although you suffer from tax erosion if you use your taxable account to harvest dividends, the method might pay off in the long run when you need sufficient funds for at least 10 years before age 60.
My recent post Can I Borrow Against My 401k Plan? Not If You Can Help It
Thanks for reading IRA vs. 401k!
With 72t withdrawals, why did you mention that they don't yield very much? Are there limits on how much you can take out? I just am curious since I am just now beginning to learn about those!
My recent post Think You're Sacrificing to Pay Down Debt? Think Again
I would put nothing into tax deferred accounts. Doing so puts you at the mercy of future tax rates. So you need to ask yourself the question to what extent do you trust Congress to not raise your tax rate to 50% plus when you are older in order to pay for the deficits being created now.
Thanks for your comment Bob! I definitely see where you're coming from.
While I agree that Congress will probably raise taxes, none of us is able to accurately predict the future. Because of that, I like the three leg approach to have a little bit of everything.
My recent post Guide to Student Loans That Everyone Should Know
I much prefer to stick to taxable accounts. Given that I want to hit financial independence as soon as possible, that seems like the way to go. The 72(t) rule is interesting, but I can't help but think that there has to be come catch to it.
My recent post Lorillard (LO) Dividend Stock Analysis
Thanks for reading myfijourney! I definitely understand where you're coming from. Even if there is not a “catch” with the 72t rule, it might be somewhat cumbersome to do/jump through hoops to get at your money.
Thanks for the great post on tax risk and management for retirement accounts. I haven't really given enough thought to the 3-legged stool, but I will now.
“As I mentioned above and previous posts, regardless of if you're in a high or low current tax bracket, you don't want to go too crazy contributing to retirement accounts (where the money is locked up until you reach 59.5 years old) unless you feel comfortable you have enough money saved up in after-tax accounts first.”
You maybe already aware this, but rule 72t means that you can get at retirement money penalty-free prior to 59.5:
http://www.investopedia.com/terms/r/rule72t.asp
My recent post Book Review: More Money Than God
Thanks for reading rjack! I have heard of the 72t rule in the past, but I sort of just ignored it since I figured there was some “catch” like you had to be 55 years old or something.
Could you educate me a little more about how the 72t rule withdrawals?
That link above says that it requires you to take at least 5 “substantially equal payments.” Are there any other requirements?
Do the 5 equal payments have to be of a certain % of your 401k/IRA account amount, etc?
My recent post Creating Your Own Three Legged Stool for Retirement – How Much of Your Investments Should be in Tax-Deferred, Taxable, and Tax-Free Accounts?
The Oblivious Investor wrote a pretty good post about it:
http://www.obliviousinvestor.com/72t-distribution…
I think it has to be 5 equal payments or a number of payments until you hit 59.5 and it has distribute the entire IRA. However, you can control this by transferring money from one IRA account to a another or new IRA account.
My recent post Book Review: More Money Than God
That is a great point about converting the 401K and IRA once not eligible to contribute, and that will likely be part of the tweaking strategy for sure.
My current distribution is roughly 70% tax free (I only worked for one company prior to new job and moved all to Roth IRA), 10% tax deferred (will be catching up with new 401K), and 20% in after tax investments. So, give it a couple of years and I should be getting to the right balance.
My recent post Landscaping – Make It Look Good, But Don’t Go Overboard
Nice! Bravo on having the discipline in converting all of that 401k money to a Roth IRA in one year! You should have a hefty income tax bill to pay in 2013! haha But, in my book, tax free money is some of the best type of money to have!
My recent post Creating Your Own Three Legged Stool for Retirement – How Much of Your Investments Should be in Tax-Deferred, Taxable, and Tax-Free Accounts?
This is very encouraging for my current strategy. I just rolled my previous 401k into a Roth IRA and we are maxing out our contributions to it for the past few years. The reason I am very heavy on it now is because once my wife opens a practice, we will no longer be eligible for the Roth IRA contributions. So, at that time, the tax deferred and after tax investments will catch up. Not sure if I will be balanced at retirement, but that is at least the goal.
My recent post Landscaping – Make It Look Good, But Don’t Go Overboard
Glad to hear things are going well Greg! Don't forget that even though you may not be eligible to make roth ira CONTRIBUTIONS once your wife opens the practice, you probably can still do a backdoor roth ira contribution, by contributing a regular IRA or traditional 401k and then rolling over in to a Roth.
Do you have a rough feel for what your current distribution %'s are among the three Legs?
My recent post Creating Your Own Three Legged Stool for Retirement – How Much of Your Investments Should be in Tax-Deferred, Taxable, and Tax-Free Accounts?