As many of you all know, I am currently saving up money for a down payment and attempting to obtain a home mortgage loan in preparation for closing on the purchase of a condo/townhouse/house this fall when I begin graduate school.
Why do I want to buy a house/condo/townhouse instead of renting?
Since I will be in graduate school for 4-5 years, I would like to be building up some kind of equity during this time period, instead of just wasting money with rent payments. Additionally, I want to try to follow the rule of thumb that it is better to buy your housing if you plan to be in the property for 3-5 years or longer.
Note: in a future post, I am planning to create a rent vs. buy calculator spreadsheet for everyone to use.
From a previous post (see link below), I was able to calculate that the loan amount I can afford is ~$95,000.
My Money Blog – How Much of a Mortgage Loan Can I Afford?
While I am certain that with my income right now, I can get approved for a home loan, I was not really sure if I would be able to gain approval for a home loan this fall, given that my income will be drastically less ($23,000 per year) during graduate school.
However, approximately 1 month ago, I went ahead and applied for pre-approval of a home mortgage loan, using a mortgage broker that was recommended by both the real estate agent and a friend who is also in graduate school.
I filled out all of the forms, provided tax statements, proof of income, proof of 2 years of employment, total net worth calculations, and account statements from where my various investment instruments are located.
Everything seemed to be going well, and the mortgage broker calculated that he should attempt to pre-approve me for a $125,000 FHA home loan (3.5% down payment minimum). However, when my application was submitted, the mortgage underwriter could not approve it due to the following reasons:
Interestingly enough, it was never mentioned that my application was denied due to the normal reasons you hear about, such as insufficient credit or lack of income or liquidity.
He said that I would need a non-occupant to cosign the mortgage loan with me in order to get approved.
Conclusion
While it may be possible for a graduate student to obtain a home mortgage loan as the sole borrower, I definitely was not able to, given the income I will be receiving. It really seemed to throw off the mortgage lenders that I was going to be a paid student, as I am guessing they don’t receive too many of those applications.
In order to qualify for a home mortgage, you will most likely have to have a co-signer/co-borrower, even with great credit and a sizable net worth.
Keep on learning!
Jacob
To receive updates on topics such as this one as soon as they are published, click on the link below to subscribe to My Money Blog:
Jacob
To receive updates on topics such as this one as soon as they are published, click on the link below to subscribe to My Money Blog:
From April 7th (when the last portfolio update was published – see link below for more information) to May 4th, the S&P 500 index went down 1.33%.
My Money Blog – April 2010 Portfolio and Net Worth
During that time period, my net worth increased 5.24%. I have now achieved the following financial goals in 2010:
Currently, 31% of my net worth is invested in fixed income instruments (cash or bond funds), and 69% is invested in equity. This is undoubtedly off of my targets of 25% and 75%, respectively, for these categories. The cash portion of my net worth has increased significantly since I am building up funds for a down payment for the condo I want to purchase this fall.
While the overall percentages for these categories are not ideal, a detailed look (table below) at the allocation breakdown reveals the real story and provides for better analysis of the current state.
Remember: a red flag goes off if your current % allocation in a category is greater than +/- 5% off of the target allocation.
% Cash (money market target 5%) 15%
% non-inflat Bond Funds (target 15%) 15%
% TIPS Bonds (target 5%) 0%
% International Equity (Target 11%) 12%
% International Emerging Markets (Target 11%) 7%
% Domestic Large Cap (Target 8%) 20%
% Domestic Small Cap (Target 9%) 10%
% Domestic Small Cap Value (Target 13%) 8%
% Domestic Large Cap Value (Target 13%) 6%
% REIT (target 10%) 6%
The components of my portfolio highlighted in red above are outside of the 5% safety band, and therefore, need to be analyzed for reallocation. Unfortunately, due to my current situation of saving up money for a mortgage down payment, it may just not be possible to satisfy all requirements at this time.
Note: as mentioned before, I currently have a VERY large percentage of my portfolio in Domestic Large Cap stocks. This is due to the fact that I was contributing 100% of my 401k contributions purchase S&P500 index fund shares for 1.5 years.
Towards the end of March, I began moving money from the S&P500 fund to a domestic small cap fund in my 401k. This progress can be seen by the fact that the domestic small cap funds now make up 10% of my net worth, up from 6% at the beginning of March. Since the proportion has now passed my domestic small cap allocation target of 9%, I will stop this transfer activity.
My next moves for the May/June time frame will be to do the following:
Jacob
To receive updates on topics such as this one as soon as they are published, click on the link below to subscribe to My Money Blog:
Good evening everyone!
As I have stated in previous posts (and as you can see by the advertisement in the website sidebar), I am an avid believer is using Netflix for receiving/viewing movies as opposed to paying for cable tv. See the link below for more details.
When I came home tonight from work, by a stroke of luck, Netflix sent me 4 one month FREE trial memberships that I can share with people, so I figured I would post them on the site!
How do you get your free Netflix trial?
What is included in the free trial?
Keep on learning!
Jacob
To receive updates on topics such as this one as soon as they are published, click on the link below to subscribe to My Money Blog:
In previous posts (shown at the links below), I briefly talked about how one of the small businesses I have started over the years was an eBay resale business, and that I think eBay is a very effective medium for people to make extra money around the house by selling their unused belongings.
How to Start Your Own Business
Sell Your Unused Items on eBay
However, in these posts, what I did not address was the fact that internet sellers definitely have a choice for where they want to sell their items. Since I have had a significant amount of experience selling on eBay and Amazon, I figured I would devote a series of postings to seeing how eBay and Amazon stack up against each other.
Executive Summary
In short, my experiences have shown that overall, eBay.com is a much more profitable way to sell your items than Amazon, due to Amazon’s high fees. Additionally, Amazon has structured itself to seemingly put buyers first, instead of eBay who you can tell really makes every effort to keep sellers happy.
So, that is the overall message I am wanting to deliver to you all. Now for the more detailed look at the way Amazon and eBay work, and the cost structure for each. First, let’s take a look at eBay.com.
eBay.com
Amazon.com
**See the link below for a summary of selling fees and format on Amazon.com
Amazon.com – Selling on Amazon
Selling Example
Now that I’ve walked you all through the various differences between selling items on Amazon and eBay, let’s go through an example to see how the fees compare for a hypothetical sale of a used Avatar movie DVD.
On Amazon, in order to sell your DVD, you would have to price it at $12.15 + $2.98 shipping in order to have the lowest price. Let’s now calculate what fees you would pay for selling this, and how your profit shakes out (we’ll assume that shipping costs exactly what you received from the seller):
$12.15 sale price
-$0.99 closing fee
-$0.80 additional DVD/Video closing fee
-$1.83 15% value closing fee
——————————-
= $8.53 remaining profit – you paid 29.7% of the sale price in fees
On eBay, the last used Avatar DVD sold for $13.99 + $3.00 shipping (can be seen using the completed listings feature). Let’s now calculate the total fees and resulting profit, assuming that shipping costs you exactly what your buyer paid you.
$13.99 sale price
-$0.50 listing fee
-$1.26 final value fee of 9% of sale price
-$0.81 Paypal fee
————————————
= $11.42 remaining profit – you paid 18.4% of the sale price in fees.
So, as we can see by the previous example, you end up paying more than 10% more in fees with Amazon than eBay. This is mainly due to the fixed fees that Amazon applies, whereas eBay’s fees are mostly all % sale price/list price based.
Obviously, it would be much more profitable to sell your Avatar DVD on eBay!
When would it be better to sell your items on Amazon?
While we have seen that in general, it is better/more profitable to sell your items on eBay, there are several times when it would be a better idea to sell your items on Amazon. These situations are summarized below:
Well, time for dinner for me! I hope this post helps you understand eBay, Amazon, and how the two compare. Please let me know if you have any questions.
To view Part 2 of this series, click the link below:
My Money Blog – eBay vs. Amazon – Part 2 – Comparison of Buying
Keep on learning!
Jacob
To receive updates on topics such as this one as soon as they are published, click on the link below to subscribe to My Money Blog:
In previous posts, I have covered the following topics related to mortgage payments and asset allocation:
However, in these posts, I did not include exactly how the mortgage payments (and resulting home equity that is built) should fit in to your overall asset allocation target/strategy. This will be the subject of today’s posting.
To try to shed some light on this topic, let’s first see what the financial advisors do to handle this question. We will then see how we need to adapt their strategy since we have no restrictions with what we do.
How do financial professionals handle the asset allocation strategy with home equity?
Through an examination of the opinions of the financial press (see three links below), I discovered that there are basically three “camps” when it comes to opinions on how home equity should be treated when it comes to figuring out your overall asset allocation.
1) Not including home equity in the target asset allocation percentages at all.
This approach is generally taken because real estate values/equity are difficult to determine exactly and because most of the time, it is not possible to adjust your allocation %’s in real estate because you cannot simply leave a house for another one.
2) Not including home equity in asset allocation percentages unless it is an investment property (so not including including your primary residence).
This approach of excluding your primary residence from your asset allocation decision making is taken because of the fact that you NEED a place to live, and you cannot simply exchange your home for shares of a mutual fund if your allocation %’s change.
3) Include all residences, investment properties, and REIT investments as a “real estate” category in your asset allocation strategy.
This approach is generally taken to have a conservative strategy that ensures that all assets are captured. However, since it is a little harder to follow, it is generally the least popular strategy.
MyMoneyBlog – Home Equity in Asset Allocation
BusinessWeek.com – Home Equity in Asset Allocation?
Investment News – Including Home Equity in Asset Allocation
Which approach will I take?
I believe that for my needs, situation, and investment style, I am going to choose to follow Approach #1 – not including my future home equity in the property I am planning to purchase this fall – with a slight adjustment.
Why is this exactly?
In short, home equity in a single house cannot be considered exposure to real estate because it is not diversified enough.
A passage on pages 282-285 of one of my favorite asset allocation books titled, “What Wall Street Doesn’t Want You to Know,” by Larry Swedroe does a great job of breaking this down in to terms the layperson can understand.
In the book, Swedroe describes that your home is clearly real estate.
However, it is very undiversified real estate in the following ways:
So, because the home you live in is very undiversified and have trust deeds associated with it, counting it towards the real estate portion of your overall asset allocation would be as foolish as a Pfizer executive counting a large quantity of Pfizer stock as their sole exposure to large cap US asset class. They are really not diversified one bit.
Since owning even one share of an index real estate investment mutual fund, such as a REIT that Vanguard, gives you broad exposure to all types of real estate across many different regions, this should be the route that is chosen to represent the real estate portion of your asset allocation picture.
So, how will I treat/consider my home purchase since I am not including it in my asset allocation mix?
Just to recap – in my mind, I want to purchase a home vs. rent one for the following reasons:
On a similar note, I would want to invest in additional real estate properties to take advantage of tax benefits of home ownership, such as being excluded from paying capital gains on profit from selling the property (described in previous post at link above).
Given the considerations above, here’s the way I will treat home equity:
So, I hope this investigation/discussion helps guide you through some of the tough decisions you will have to make regarding how you will treat home ownership. As always, please let me know if you have any questions.
Keep on learning!
Jacob
To receive updates on topics such as this one as soon as they are published, click on the link below to subscribe to My Money Blog:
Because of this added fee, you will want to analyze your situation to make sure biweekly payments are the best thing for you.
When would I not want to use the biweekly mortgage payment plan?
So, in my situation, since I am accumulating an additional $3,111 by using the biweekly payment plan, this definitely warrants the addtional $3,097 expenditure needed to make it happen.
I hope this post helps you understand the biweekly mortgage payment world a little bit better! Please let me know if you have any questions.
Keep on learning!
Jacob
To receive updates on topics such as this one as soon as they are published, click on the link below to subscribe to My Money Blog: Subscribe to My Money Blog via Email
Listed below are the amounts of my federal tax refunds from the past two years.
2008 Federal Tax Refund = $2,975
2009 Federal Tax Refund = $2,347
As you can see by looking at these amounts, they are quite high! However, it wasn’t until last Thursday when I posted the amount of my 2009 tax refund on the social networking site, Facebook.com, that I was alerted that the magnitude of these sums was much higher than necessary. Given the magnitude of these taxes, I would no doubt being looking forward to the 2011 payroll tax holiday. Prior to posting on Facebook.com, I figured that these sums were pretty normal for someone that is my age with no children to claim as exceptions.
And, what was more, I learned that I could do something about it fairly easily – just by adjusting the amount of withholding that my employer keeps from my paycheck each month. Since this realization was a fairly significant and interesting find for me, I figured I would commit a post to this topic to share my mistakes with everyone and explain how you can avoid it!
How Much Is My Employer’s Maximum Withholding Costing Me?
So, let’s get started! First, just out of curiosity, I wanted to create a tool to use to capture the amount of money I had lost out on by giving the government an interest free loan instead of investing the money in a way that I found most appropriate.
What I put together can be found at the Google Docs link below. To adjust it to your specific situation, complete the following steps below:
Google Docs – How Much is Withholding Too Much Tax Costing You?
Entering the tax refunds amounts shown above that I received in 2008 and 2009, I calculated that I would currently have $795.47 more net worth than I currently have, due to the face that I gave the government a very generous interest free loan.
Dang, I really wish I would have known this before! Blast!
How Do You Adjust Your Withholding Preferences?
So, now you’ve realized that you have an opportunity to save some money by having your employer withhold less of your income for federal tax payments, how do you take action to make this a reality?
As it turns out, it is VERY easy to make this adjustment. All you have to do is either a) log-in to your employer’s online payroll management website (if available), click on the Payroll and Compensation tab, and then click on the link labeled, “Federal W-4 Tax Information” or b) call up your Human Resources department, and request that you want to view/adjust your Federal W-4 Tax Information reporting.
Please note: that the exact wording will change, depending on your employer. But as long as you know that the Federal W-4 Tax Information is what you want to adjust, you’ll find your way!
Once you have accessed the correct system (whether online or through the phone), you will then look for the field where you can adjust the total number of allowances you are claiming.
If you’re like me, you are probably wondering, “What exactly is an allowance?” Essentially, a withholding allowance is used by your employer when tabulating the amount of income tax to be withheld from each paycheck you receive. The range of withholding allowances you can choose is from 0 up to a maximum of 10. The more allowances you have, less money will be withheld for taxes. For most people, this is the same number of personal exemptions they are planning to claim on their taxes.
So, for example – if you are married and filing jointly, you would claim 2 allowances. If you are single, you would claim 1 exemption. Get the pattern?
What Amount of Withholding Is Right For Me? How Many Allowances Should I Claim?
As a general rule of thumb, a personal should claim the same amount of allowances as the number of exemptions they are claiming on their federal taxes.
However, since this is the My Money Blog, where we go all out to save every dime we can, we will use online calculators to figure out what number of allowances we should be claiming so that we do not overpay on our taxes.
The two best withholding calculators I could find online can be accessed using the links below. To use them, click on the links, print off a copy of your current paycheck with all of the deductions for taxes and insurance premiums, and fill out the required fields in the calculators.
IRS Withholding Calculator
HRBlock – Tax Withholding Calculator
Using the calculators above, I saw the following results –
Using the HRBlock Calculator, it computed that I should be claiming 10 allowances (the maximum). While this may seem pretty crazy, it may actually make sense because I will be taking a 67% paycut when I attend graduate school full time this fall. However, I am a little cautious to follow this since the HRBlock calculator does not take in to consideration the wages that I will receive while working as a graduate student this fall.
The verbatum results from the IRS Withholding Calculator are as follows. “Based on the information you previously entered, your anticipated income tax for 2010 is $1,885. If you do not change your current withholding arrangement, you will have $7,020 withheld for 2010, resulting in an overpayment of $5,135 when you file your return. If you want your withholding to more closely match your anticipated tax, adjust your withholding on a new Form W-4 as follows:
Assuming these recommended allowance(s) are in effect for the rest of 2010, your expected refund should be about $600. Following this recommendation will ensure that the amount withheld from your wages will cover all of your projected tax liability while minimizing your refund.”
So, looks like 6 allowances is the number that I am changing my claimed allowances to! 🙂 I tend to trust this number more because the IRS Calculator gave me the opportunity to enter my salary that I will be earning throughout the entire year.
And, do you want to know the great thing? Since I have already paid enough taxes this year for the 6 allowance level, I will not have any federal income tax withheld from my paychecks after making this change!
Do You Ever Have to Pay Penalties For Not Having Enough Taxes Withheld?
Before I jump in and increase my number of withholding sixfold from 0 to 6, I want to also know if I will be penalized for doing this by the IRS. In other words, I want an answer to the question, “Will I be penalized if I underpay the IRS for decreasing my withholding?”
According to the article at the link below, the IRS penalizes taxpayers who have to pay more than 10% of their tax when they file their annual tax return. So, theoretically, since the IRS calculator states that I will still have a refund of $600 for 2010, I should be all right and not get penalized.
Penalties for Not Having Enough Tax Withheld
When Would It Be a Good Thing to Get a Big Refund Back?
Since I am a fairly effective saver of money, having larger than necessary amounts of money withheld from my paycheck is not needed, in my opinion.
However, I do believe claiming fewer allowances than needed is good for people that have trouble saving money because it acts as a forced savings program (similar to the way paying for a home mortgage is, by nature, a forced savings plan).
I hope this post was insightful and that it helps you on the road to financial success. Please let me know if you have any questions.
Keep on learning!
Jacob
To receive updates on topics such as this one as soon as they are published, click on the link below to subscribe to My Money Blog:
In a previous post (see link below), I described the various long-term financial ramifications and cost savings that could result, depending on the type of wine you choose to buy.
My Money Blog – Comparison of Wine Prices
In this post, I briefly mentioned the commonly known hypothesis that drinking two glasses of wine per day will result in better health and longer life. However, is this really the truth? And if so, how does it work? What causes you to have longer life? Does this benefit come from all wines or just some specific types?
The answers to these questions will be the topic of today’s post. Let’s get started.
Does Drinking Wine Help You Live Longer?
To gain an insight in to this ongoing debate, we first need to know if drinking wine helps you live longer.
And, through an investigation of the two articles from Xomba.com and Webmd.com (can be found at the links below), it appears that the answer to this question is, “yes.”
Xomba.com – Will Drinking Wine Help You Live Longer?
Webmd.com – Does Drinking Wine Give Longer Life?
The results showed that men who drank less than half a half glass of wine per day lived an average of five years longer than men who avoided wine completely. They also had a lower risk of heart disease and heart attack.
To my surprise, the results are much less clear for women. While some studies have shown that there is potential for women to improve their heart health by drinking small amounts of wine, other studies have shown that drinking even small amounts of this delightful drink could result in an increased risk of breast cancer, a disease that is already horribly prevalent in the women population.
How Does Drinking Wine Help You Live Longer?
While the study results conclusively support the finding that drinking wine improves health (at least in men), scientists are not certain of what exactly causes the improvement to occur. Nonetheless, there are several hypotheses attempting to explain the result.
Hypothesis 1) Wine is a source of phytochemicals, including flavonoids and polyphenols, that contribute to wine’s ability to increase lifespan. According to the link below, although the experiments are currently ongoing, flavonoids show potential to stabilize blood capillaries (i.e. improve cardiovascular health) and excite enzymes that destroy mutagens (i.e. reducing risk of cancer) in the body.
Wikipedia.org – Flavonoids
Hypothesis 2) Wine is a source of resveratol. According to the link below from Wikipedia, resveratol is a chemical that occurs naturally in certain plants to protect from attack of bacteria, fungi, and other microscopic predators.
Resveratol has currently been shown in mice and rats to have anti-cancer, anti-inflammatory, blood-sugar-lowering and other beneficial cardiovascular effects (similar to what is seen from a calorie-restricted diet). However, conclusive results have yet to be seen in humans.
Wikipedia – Resveratrol
What Types of Wine Carry This Benefit?
As it turns out, white wine drinkers are out of luck when it comes to lifespan extensions. The reason for this is due to the manners in which white and red wine are made. White wine is made from the juice of the grapes, and red wine is made using the whole grape.
And, since the skin is where the chemicals discussed above are created and stored, red wine is the only type of wine that offers health benefits (in small quantities of course).
What’s the Bottom Line?
So, although it is not yet determined exactly what the cause is, it is certain that small quantities of red wine (1-2 glasses per day) do improve health and increase lifespan in men. So, drink up men!
For women, even though the results are less “cut and dry,” I still wouldn’t worry too much about indulging in a glass or two every day – especially if it is something that gives you happiness!
Keep on learning!
Jacob
To receive updates on topics such as this one as soon as they are published, click on the link below to subscribe to My Money Blog: