How Does Home Ownership Fit in to Your Overall Asset Allocation?

In previous posts, I have covered the following topics related to mortgage payments and asset allocation:

However, in these posts, I did not include exactly how the mortgage payments (and resulting home equity that is built) should fit in to your overall asset allocation target/strategy. This will be the subject of today’s posting.

To try to shed some light on this topic, let’s first see what the financial advisors do to handle this question. We will then see how we need to adapt their strategy since we have no restrictions with what we do.

How do financial professionals handle the asset allocation strategy with home equity?
Through an examination of the opinions of the financial press (see three links below), I discovered that there are basically three “camps” when it comes to opinions on how home equity should be treated when it comes to figuring out your overall asset allocation.

1) Not including home equity in the target asset allocation percentages at all.

This approach is generally taken because real estate values/equity are difficult to determine exactly and because most of the time, it is not possible to adjust your allocation %’s in real estate because you cannot simply leave a house for another one.

2) Not including home equityย in asset allocation percentagesย unlessย it isย an investment property (soย not includingย including your primary residence).

This approach of excluding your primary residence from your asset allocation decision making is taken because of the fact that you NEEDย a place to live, and you cannot simply exchange your home for shares of a mutual fund if your allocation %’s change.

3) Include all residences, investment properties, and REIT investmentsย as a “real estate” category in your asset allocation strategy.

This approach is generally taken to have a conservative strategy that ensures that all assets are captured. However, since it is a little harder to follow, it is generally the least popular strategy.

MyMoneyBlog – Home Equity in Asset Allocation
BusinessWeek.com – Home Equity in Asset Allocation?
Investment News – Including Home Equity in Asset Allocation

Which approach will I take?
I believe that for my needs, situation, and investment style, I am going to choose to follow Approach #1 – not including my future home equity in the property I am planning to purchase this fall –ย with a slight adjustment.

Why is this exactly?
In short, home equity in a single house cannot be considered exposure to real estate because it is not diversified enough.

A passage on pages 282-285 of one of my favorite asset allocation books titled, “What Wall Street Doesn’t Want You to Know,” by Larry Swedroe does a great job of breaking this down in to terms the layperson can understand.

In the book, Swedroe describes that your home is clearly real estate.

However, it is very undiversified real estate in the following ways:

  • It is undiversified by type (aka office, warehouse, industrial, multifamily residential, single family residential, hotel, etc) and owning a single family home only gives you exposure to a small piece of the overall real estate sector.
  • It is undiversified geographically (meaning that real estate prices in different areas of the country vary greatly due to what employers are present there and how well they are doing – just think of if you lived in a small town where 90% of the wealth comes from one manufacturing company, and that one company shuts down. Real estate prices will plummet).

So, because the home you live in is very undiversified and have trust deeds associated with it, counting it towards the real estate portion of your overall asset allocation would be as foolish as a Pfizer executiveย counting a large quantity ofย Pfizer stock as their sole exposure to large capย US asset class. They are really not diversified one bit.

Sinceย owning even one share of anย indexย real estate investment mutual fund, such as a REIT that Vanguard, gives you broad exposure to all types of real estate across many different regions, this should be the route that is chosen to represent the real estate portion of your asset allocation picture.

I would highly recommend picking up a copy of Swedroe’s book at Amazon.com. Just click on the link below, and buy a cheap used copy!

So, how will I treat/consider my home purchase since I am not including it in my asset allocation mix?
Just to recap – in my mind, I want to purchase a home vs. rent one for the following reasons:

  1. I am always going to need to live somewhere.
  2. To take advantage of the tax benefits associated with home ownership, such as tax deductions for property taxes and interest paymentsย (see information at the following link – My Money Blog – Tax Benefits of Home Ownership)
  3. To gain some equity and increase my net worth while making my cost of living payments.

On a similar note, I would want to invest in additionalย real estateย properties to take advantage of tax benefits of home ownership, such as being excludedย from paying capital gains on profit from selling the propertyย (described in previous post at link above).

Given the considerations above, here’s the way I will treat home equity:

  • Shoot for getting as close as possible toย paying a 20% downpayment, since this reduces cost by having to avoid Prive Mortgage Insurance.
  • Sign up for a bi-weekly mortgage payment plan and payย off mortgage according to that schedule (see post atย following link for more informationย My Money Blog – Biweekly Mortgage Payment Plan), according to the My Money Blog – Account Hierarchy.
  • Track my home equity as part of my net worth, but not in my overall asset allocation targets.
  • Continue to pay off my biweekly payments on my mortgage through graduate school, aspiring to obtain 40-45% of my net worth in property ownership, as recommended by the article from Business Week (see link above for more details).
  • A number of years down the road, if it becomes apparent that the % of my net worth that is represented by property ownership dips too far below 40%, I would then use that % as a starting place to make a decision if I would want to invest in additional rental property.

So, I hope this investigation/discussion helps guide you through some of the tough decisions you will have to make regarding how you will treat home ownership. As always, please let me know if you have any questions.

Keep on learning!

Jacob

To receive updates on topics such as this one as soon as they are published, click on the link below to subscribe to My Money Blog:

Subscribe to My Money Blog via Email

About the Author Jacob A Irwin

Hi folks! My name is Jacob. I am the owner and operator of My Personal Finance Journey. I started this blog in January of 2010 and have enjoyed the journey ever since. Since finishing up graduate school in Virginia in 2014, I have been working in biopharmaceutical development in Colorado. You can read more about me and this site hereโ€‹. Please contact me if you have any questions!

follow me on:
  • Juggalo1 says:

    I am considering this topic for myself, and I find the reasons you cite to leave your home off your allocation unpersuasive. Most particularly in your discussion of your home as undiversified, and susceptible to major losses of wealth, wouldn’t you want to account for that? You’re taking a risk, and if you’re home goes down in value you are losing real wealth. Shouldn’t your strategy, allocations and stock investments account for that?

    • Thanks for reading Juggalo! I'll admit that this isn't a completely straightforward topic.

      First, I believe that you are correct in that having your home go down in value is not something that should be taken lightly.

      But, the trouble in incorporating a single home in to my asset allocation is that it is not the same type of diversified asset as the other components of my portfolio (index mutual funds). If one of my index mutual fund classes goes down, I would simply buy more.

      On the other hand, if your home goes down in value (or up in value), what can you do? You can't buy or sell more really. I suppose that if your home decreased in value, you could buy more REIT shares, but your home and a REIT (in my mind) are almost not the same asset class. REITs represent thousands of real estate properties across the country. If you home increased in value, I suppose you could also sell REIT shares, but in my mind, that takes away your exposure to the COMPLETE real estate market and upside potential there.

      Overall, I think that since my investing strategy uses index funds and not individual stocks, I think of it slightly different. I'd be interested in hearing your take on this again! Thanks for reading!
      My recent post $141.20 Giveaway – Community and Charity 10% Monthly Blog Income Give Back # 5 – February 2012 Edition

  • >