————————————————————————————————————————
Welcome to My Personal Finance Journey! If you are new here, please read the “About” or “First-Time Visitor” pages to find out more about us. If you would like to receive free updates on articles like this by email, then sign up here or you can subscribe to the RSS feed. Also, check us out on Twitter or Facebook. Thanks for visiting! Keep on learning!
————————————————————————————————————————
Click here to enter my free giveaway for 2 copies of H&R Block At Home Premium Edition
“Better late than never” is my favorite phrase this afternoon! I apologize for being a week late reporting this, but the latest (May 2011) edition of the Carnival of Passive Investing is now live over at The College Investor at the link below.
Carnival of Passive Investing # 6 – Passive Investing Do’s and Don’ts May 2011 Edition with Passive Investing Author Rick Ferri
Congrats to Wealth Informatics, Boomer and Echo, and Little House in the Valley for being selected as the top 3 articles this month by Rick and Robert @ The College Investor.
We were honored this past month to have Rick Ferri, author of numerous passive investing books helping to judge/rank the top 5 passive investing articles. Great job Rick!
This month (June), another one of my favorite passive investing authors, Larry Swedroe, will be helping to rank the final selection, with the help of our host, Jon Elder @ Free Money Wisdom.
Be sure to get your best passive investing articles submitted this month for Larry to review. You can submit your articles by clicking here.
How about you all? Have you written any good passive investing posts lately?
Who is your favorite financial author?
Share your experiences by commenting below!
***Photo courtesy of http://www.flickr.com/photos/vegaseddie/3309218023/sizes/z/in/photostream/
————————————————————————————————————————
Welcome to My Personal Finance Journey! If you are new here, please read the “About” or “First-Time Visitor” pages to find out more about us. If you would like to receive free updates on articles like this by email, then sign up here or you can subscribe to the RSS feed. Also, check us out on Twitter or Facebook. Thanks for visiting! Keep on learning!
————————————————————————————————————————
Click here to enter my free giveaway for 2 copies of H&R Block At Home Premium Edition
The following is a guest post. Enjoy!
So, with all that we are using the Internet, the question of how can we be sure that our details are secure is of great importance to all of us.
How about you all? How do you protect your identity and personal information online? How cautious are you about sharing personal information? How much do you worry about it being stolen?
Share your experiences by commenting below!
Jacob’s Thoughts – Listed below are my random thoughts as I was reading this article.
***Photo courtesy of http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2381/2580085025_7f1cc8d205.jpg
Well folks, it’s been on my research topics list since January of this year, but during the past several days, I’ve finally been able to perform the detailed comparative analysis the topic deserves.
What topic is this, you’re probably asking? The topic is Valuation-Informed Indexing (or Valuation-Informed Index Fund Investing – however you want to call it). This topic/investing strategy was first introduced to me by Rob Bennett when he guest posted on the subject over at Free From Broke and has been the topic of numerous online and offline discussions in the personal finance world.
Reading Rob’s post really got me interested in this form of investing, because it is sort of an attempt to put a more actively managed role on my current investing strategy of passive investing, but without all of the emotion that normally causes the performance of active investors to suffer. More specifically, I wanted to find out two things after first hearing about Valuation-Informed Indexing. These are described below:
So, armed with nothing but a Toshiba laptop, a “why-not” attitude, and a smile, I set off in trying to find some answers to the aforementioned goals.
Note from Jacob: I really get a lot of enjoyment out of these types of post that require putting together a spreadsheet, inputting some interest rate formulas, and analyzing large amounts of historical data. Maybe it is the scientist in me that enjoys this!
Truthfully, it was fairly difficult to figure out the exact method that defines Valuation-Informed Index Investing and makes it different from passive investing. This is most likely due to the fact that it doesn’t yet have a wide following, as opposed to passive investing where there are shelves full of books written on the subject!
However, through study of 1) Rob Bennett’s website about Valuation-Informed Indexing (in particular, his “How To” guide) and 2) Professor Wade Pfau’s preliminary research, I was able to piece together enough information to define the VII method and construct a study.
In a general sense, Valuation-Informed Indexing involves changing your asset allocation targets in response to fluctuations in market prices. What does this mean exactly? It means that you should have a higher equity asset allocation when the market is lower and a lower equity asset allocation when the market is high.
Now, this all sounds well and good. But, the real question is “How do we actually go about doing this in a way that doesn’t introduce investor sentiment and ineffective market timing tactics?” VII has an answer to this too!
A summary of the Valuation-Informed Indexing methodology is summarized below:
Application of this strategy is supposed to deliver superior returns at much less risk (standard deviation of returns) than a fixed asset allocation with regular rebalancing (in other words, passive investing).
The only other numerical studies comparing passive investing to Valuation-Informed Indexing were conducted by Professor Wade Pfau. His preliminary findings can be found here, and the definitive, complete report, can be found at this link.
Wade’s findings reveal that VII provides more wealth for 102 of the 110 rolling 30-year periods from 1870 to 1980. However, in recent years, it appears that the out performance of VII over passive investing is becoming less and less.
As someone in my mid-20’s, the time period I was most curious about was the most recent twenty year period. Additionally, I wanted to test this period because in order for me to be convinced to give up passive investing in favor of Valuation-Informed Investing, I would need to see demonstration of its superiority in a time frame that is more relevant to me.
Lastly, over any 20 year period, it would reason to believe that random, short term fluctuations in the market should be hidden by the correct, overall, long term behavior.
So, now that I’ve explained a little bit about what Valuation-Informed Indexing is in general and what existing research has been done on the subject, we can now get in to the specific investigation that I conducted.
The details of how I set up my analysis are summarized below:
· Investment Total – For simplicity, we will assume that our investment only consists of a one-time initial purchase of $10,000. Transaction fees, fund expense ratios, and taxes will not be considered in the scope of this analysis.
The complete results/details of my comparison between VII and passive investing can be found at the following Google Docs Spreadsheet – Valuation-Informed Investing vs. Passive Investing. Rows 1696 and 1697 contain the total return and standard deviation (risk level) for each portfolio.
The table below shows a summary of the portfolio returns and standard deviations of the analysis. Three passive investing portfolios were compared to three different Valuation-Informed Indexing portfolios/strategies. It’s interesting to note that from 1990-2011, the PE10 never fell to the lower trigger point level of 12.
As can be seen in the table, passive investing with monthly rebalancing resulted in total returns over the ~20 year time period of 239%, 267%, and 220%, for 60/40, 75/25, and 50/50, asset allocation splits, respectively.
For comparison, three different Valuation-Informed Indexing strategies/portfolios were employed, as described below:
Valuation-Informed Indexing Portfolio 1
Using this strategy, a total return over the time period analyzed was 185% (much less than the 60/40 asset allocation passive investing portfolio).
Valuation-Informed Indexing Portfolio 2
Because the total return obtained from Portfolio 1 failed to outperform the passive investing portfolios, I decided to attempt to refine the strategy (because I really do feel that there is potential for this form of investing! We just have to find it!).
Next, I proceeded to take the average PE10 from 1990-May 2011, and saw that the average PE10 was a whopping 25.68. Since this PE10 seems to be higher than we’ve seen historically, I figured that maybe by increasing the upper trigger to 25, a higher return would be seen.
Making this change, the strategy for Portfolio 2 becomes as follows:
Using this strategy resulted in a total return over the time period of 195% – higher than Portfolio 1, but still much lower than the passive portfolios.
Valuation-Informed Indexing Portfolio 3
In a final effort to increase my returns using VII, I next tried to increase my equity exposure during “high PE10” times to 50% equity/50% fixed income (instead of 30/70 in Portfolio 1 and 2).
Making this adaptation, the strategy for Portfolio 3 becomes as follows:
Using this strategy resulted in a total return over the time period of 221% – higher than Portfolio 1 and 2, but still much lower than the passive portfolios, with the exception of the 50/50 asset allocation one.
Conclusion – Passive investing outperforms Valuation-Informed Indexing in the past 20 years, but VII displays much less risk. This is consistent with the normal risk/return correlation.
So, what can we conclude from all of these results and confusing numbers? In my opinion, we can take away several key things.
1) While Valuation-Informed Index Investing may have outperformed passive investing in most previous historical periods, evidence of it not performing as well in recent years is enough to keep me as a passive investor, at least until VII is refined.
a. It’s interesting to note that by using the VII methodology, an investor would have been 30% equity / 70% fixed income from January 1995 until September 2008. The investor would have taken on less risk (in the subsequent market crash of 2008-2009) by owning fewer equity shares during this “high price” time. However, he or she also almost totally missed out on the 163% total return during the ~13 year time period.
2) Valuation-Informed Index Investing has great potential because it greatly reduces the risk to investor returns.
a. Even though VII failed to outperform passive investing in my analysis, it also provided much less risk, as evidenced by the sharp decrease in standard deviation of the portfolio value over time.
b. For example, VII Portfolio 1 provides a slightly lower return of 185% over the time period analyzed (compared to the passive investing portfolios). However, the portfolio also has 34%, 55%, and 21% less risk (standard deviation of portfolio value) compared to the 60/40, 75/25, and 50/50 passive portfolios, respectively.
This ability of VII to deliver sufficient (but slightly lower) returns at less risk is what I think is the real power of Valuation-Informed Indexing. I feel that with some refinements, VII can become an effective investing strategy. However, I’m not quite ready to switch over just yet…Thanks for reading!
How about you all? Have you ever tried or heard of Valuation-Informed Index Investing? What are your thoughts about its efficacy? What improvements do you think need to be made?
Share your experiences by commenting below!
***Photo courtesy of
————————————————————————————————————————
Welcome to My Personal Finance Journey! If you are new here, please read the “About” or “First-Time Visitor” pages to find out more about us. If you would like to receive free updates on articles like this by email, then sign up here or you can subscribe to the RSS feed. Also, check us out on Twitter or Facebook. Thanks for visiting! Keep on learning!
————————————————————————————————————————
Click here to enter my free giveaway for 2 copies of H&R Block At Home Premium Edition
Happy Memorial Day to everyone! In the spirit of celebrating success and taking a break on this holiday, I wanted to share something very special that happened to My Personal Finance Journey this past Saturday, May 27th, 2011.
We passed the 50,000 total visitors threshold!
This is very exciting news for all of us here at My Personal Finance Journey, even to Cheapskate Jake, who, to my surprise, hasn’t scared too many people away! Go figure!
It’s been an incredibly fun journey (pardon reference to the site name) to get to where we are today. This site started on January 15th of 2010 (almost a year and a half ago) as a way for me to share what I’ve learned about personal finance and investing and learn from other like-minded folks. I definitely had no idea when I started this site that it would be such a large part of my life and identity.
If I had to venture a guess, I’d say that I’ve spent about 1500 total hours on this blog. Big hint here: if you’re looking for a get rich quick venture, blogging probably isn’t the best for you! During this 1500 total hours, there have been 378 posts written by both myself and various guest posters (we’re not quite to the 500 post mark yet!).
When I think back on this ~1.5 year journey, there have been several accomplishments/actions in particular (other than simply writing posts) that stick out in my mind as being most significant. I’ve listed these below:
To close, I just want to say “THANK YOU” to all my readers! This milestone (obviously) would not have been possible without you, and your continued interaction and commentary keeps me going as a blogger!
How about you all? What have been some of your favorite posts from this site in the past year? If you are a site owner, have you hit any important site milestones recently?
Share your experiences by commenting below!
***Photo courtesy of http://www.flickr.com/photos/squeakymarmot/1019406320/sizes/z/in/photostream/
————————————————————————————————————————
Welcome to My Personal Finance Journey! If you are new here, please read the “About” or “First-Time Visitor” pages to find out more about us. If you would like to receive free updates on articles like this by email, then sign up here or you can subscribe to the RSS feed. Also, check us out on Twitter or Facebook. Thanks for visiting! Keep on learning!
————————————————————————————————————————
Click here to enter my free giveaway for 2 copies of H&R Block At Home Premium Edition
If you’ve stopped by my site before, you probably know that I am a proud supporter and practitioner of passive investing strategies. In fact, in January of this year, I started The Carnival of Passive Investing just for the purpose of spreading the word about this very effective style of investing.
Essentially, passive investing involves the use of different types of index ETFs and mutual funds to obtain a target asset allocation based upon your personal tolerance for risk. By applying this simple passive investing approach, we are able to actually outperform 70-80% of investing “professionals.”
So, needless to say that I am a big supporter of any new products or services that makes it easier for individual investors to get off of the foolish active investing (individual stock investing) track and in to the proven world of passive investing.
One of these services facilitating passive investing that I was recently exposed to is Betterment.com.
The fee structure at Betterment is in my mind, a very good deal. There are no minimum account balances (I started my account with $10), no transaction fees, and you can withdraw your money at any time. In addition, you can change your asset allocation a maximum of once per day and your portfolio is rebalanced once per quarter back to your asset allocation targets. Not bad right?!
For all of this, you pay a fixed expense ratio/fee of 0.3-0.9%, based on what amount of money you have invested. Since most actively managed funds charge far more than 1% to under perform the market, this is quite good!
Currently, Betterment is only offering individual, taxable investment accounts. I would like to see them add Traditional and Roth IRA options at some point, and the VP of Marketing for Betterment just informed me that they will be on the way shortly!
Another really cool feature of Betterment is that they offer a simulator that will allow you to predict the value of your portfolio a set number of years in the future based on various asset allocation levels. I’ve pasted a screenshot of this tool below.
“So, what’s the bottom line, Jacob? After reading this Betterment review, how do I decide if Betterment is right for me?”
As you might have guessed, this comes down to your personal preference of how involved you want to be in your investing strategy of any money outside of your retirement accounts (because remember, Betterment doesn’t yet have IRAs).
Betterment is not right for you if you enjoy selecting which ETFs or index mutual funds to invest in and rebalancing back to your asset allocation targets throughout the year.
Betterment is right for you if you want a very simple, low-cost way to invest the correct way by making one asset allocation decision and then just watching your money grow.
How about you all? Have you used Betterment? Are you a fan of these single solution asset allocation investments?
Share your experiences by commenting below!
————————————————————————————————————————
Welcome to My Personal Finance Journey! If you are new here, please read the “About” or “First-Time Visitor” pages to find out more about us. If you would like to receive free updates on articles like this by email, then sign up here or you can subscribe to the RSS feed. Also, check us out on Twitter or Facebook. Thanks for visiting! Keep on learning!
————————————————————————————————————————
Click here to enter my free giveaway for 2 copies of H&R Block At Home Premium Edition
Overall, the 1st half of 2011 continues to go very well.
The market continues to trend upwards, and investors are enjoying some nice gains in their portfolios. Here in Virginia, it feels that summer is almost upon us (inspired picture at right). You can smell the barbecues cooking on your way home, and neighborhood pools are beginning to open. For me, summer means a couple things – trail running, hiking, camping, and road biking!
However, I’m getting off track here. You all stopped by for the net worth growth update!
From April 1st, 2011 (when the last portfolio update was published – see link below for more information) to 29-April-2011, the S&P 500 index went up by 2.85%. Pretty nice little run for a month, eh?! Let’s hope it keeps up!
My Personal Finance Journey – January-March, 2011 Portfolio and Net Worth
During that time period, my net worth (excluding condo ownership) increased by 2.55%.
Condo Equity Growth
Currently, I have 10.7% home ownership in my condo (up from 9% at the end of December, 2010), with this accounting for 26% of my real net worth (so net worth subtracting the condo loan – this is different from the net worth above).
I have now achieved the following financial goals in 2011. I have done quite well I think – thanks to everyone’s help for keeping me motivated and accountable!
For a detailed list of my short term, mid term, and long term financial goals, click on the link below:
My Personal Finance Journey – Financial Goals
While the overall percentages for these categories looks pretty good, a detailed look (table below) at the allocation breakdown reveals the real story and provides for better analysis of the current state.
Remember: a red flag goes off if your current % allocation in a category is greater than +/- 5% off of the target allocation. This is my trigger that I need to rebalance that aspect of my portfolio.
% Cash (money market target 5%) 7%
% non-inflat Bond Funds (target 15%) 14%
% TIPS Bonds (target 5%) 3%
% International Equity (Target 11%) 11%
% International Emerging Markets (Target 11%) 10%
% Domestic Large Cap (Target 8%) 8%
% Domestic Small Cap (Target 8%) 9%
% Domestic Small Cap Value (Target 14%) 15%
% Domestic Large Cap Value (Target 13%) 14%
% REIT (target 10%) 9%
Analyzing my current asset allocation percentages, it appears that I am lucky enough to be exactly on target with all of my asset classes (within +/- 5% banding) .Therefore, no rebalancing is required. Always a good thing!
My next moves for the May-June, 2011 time frame will be to do the following:
Wish List
How about you all? How did you progress with your net worth in April 2011? What are your thoughts about the strength of the market?
Share your experiences by commenting below!
***Photo courtesy of http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2225/2038075453_65b965fb97.jpg
————————————————————————————————————————
Welcome to My Personal Finance Journey! If you are new here, please read the “About” or “First-Time Visitor” pages to find out more about us. If you would like to receive free updates on articles like this by email, then sign up here or you can subscribe to the RSS feed. Also, check us out on Twitter or Facebook. Thanks for visiting! Keep on learning!
————————————————————————————————————————
Click here to enter my free giveaway for 2 copies of H&R Block At Home Premium Edition
My my my. I think we all have and will always have a special place in our hearts for the 1980’s. Any decade that produced Back To The Future, one of the best movie series ever made, has got to be awesome! Not only that, 1980’s/Back To The Future gave us 2 minutes of the best Biff insults of all time. If you don’t believe me, just take a look at the video clip below!
But, before the 1980’s made like a tree and got outta’ here (excuse the Biff line), it also gave us one of the most CRAZY and random music videos I have ever seen in Bonnie Tyler’s “Total Eclipse of the Heart.” Just take a look at the video below. This video has slow motion doves, football players, ninjas, fencers, and preppy guys making a wine toast!
Interest and Inflation Rates During the 1980’s
Aside from these unforgettable media contributions, the 1980’s was also a time of incredibly high interest rates (and indeed inflation as well).
According to Money Cafe’s Prime Rate History page, the prime interest rate (the rate at which banks borrow money from the Federal Reserve) during the 1980’s was well above 10%. In fact, during the early portion of the 80’s, prime interest rates as high as 20% were seen. Now, it’s important to realize that as an investor, you wouldn’t be able to invest money at the prime interest rate (since the banks have to have a spread of around 3% less on investment products in order to make money). However, opening up a fixed income investment at 10% annual interest doesn’t sound too bad at all, right?!
During this same time (according to Jeremy Siegel’s book, Stocks for the Long Run), the annualized inflation rate was 4-5%. While this is still higher than the average annualized inflation seen from 1888-2001 of 2.68%, it is much lower than I expected it to be. Before beginning to write this post, I was suspecting that inflation was above 10% in the 1980’s.
Applying this knowledge along with the fact that the average nominal return of the stock market since 1888 has been 9.72%, it begs the following question….
Did People Take Advantage of this Situation By Locking in This High Interest Rate for a Long Period of Time? And If Not, What The Heck Were They Thinking?!
In a search for an answer to this question, I reached out to my Dad for some insight.
However, he further went on to explain that what he did do with any of his extra money was to pay off his 14.5% interest rate mortgage taken out in the early 80’s. This definitely was a wise decision, and I do believe that for people that opened up mortgage accounts in the 1980’s, it would have been a better use of your money to pay off your loan, due to high interest rates.
On the other hand, for people that didn’t have a mortgage, it would reason that it would have been a great idea to lock in a 30 year T-bond at a cushy 13.45%, knowing the historical trends.
What Can We Learn From This?
In my opinion, there are some powerful takeaways that we can learn from this analysis. I’ve tried to concisely summarize these below:
How about you all? Did you lock in a high fixed rate investment during the 1980’s? If so, what type and what interest rate did you get? If not, what kept you from doing so?
Share your experiences by commenting below!
————————————————————————————————————————
Welcome to My Personal Finance Journey! If you are new here, please read the “About” or “First-Time Visitor” pages to find out more about us. If you would like to receive free updates on articles like this by email, then sign up here or you can subscribe to the RSS feed. Also, check us out on Twitter or Facebook. Thanks for visiting! Keep on learning!
————————————————————————————————————————
Click here to enter my free giveaway for 2 copies of H&R Block At Home Premium Edition
Note: This post was selected as the #6 pick in the 103rd edition of the Best of Money Carnival, hosted at My Journey To Millions. Stop by and take a peek at all of the other great articles as well!
In the 2002 edition of the book, Stocks For The Long Run, Siegel includes a lovely little analysis/study of whether or not the stock market has had higher real returns (so this = after inflation has had its effect) when Republicans vs. Democrats have held the office of the President of the United States.
What exactly did he find from this study? Let’s take a look!
Siegel’s Results
Now, I definitely don’t want to make this a big political battle, because I am not a very “involved” political person.
However, it is no secret that the stock market in general reacts better to Republicans than Democrats. Republicans pride themselves on being champions for lower capital gains taxes and supporting the businesses that make up the stock market.
Indeed, Siegel’s findings support the theory that sentimentally (short-term), the markets do favor Republicans being President as compared to Democrats. This was determined based on the study results showing that since 1888, the market has risen 0.7% (on average) on the day following a Republican victory vs. falling an average of 0.5% the day after a Democrat victory.
This is definitely an interesting finding. However, what is really important is to determine how the market acts during the entire term of having either a Democrat or Republican in Office.
To do this, Siegel and his research team computed the annualized real return (after inflation) during each Presidential term since Harrison became President in 1888. The results of this portion of the analysis are listed below:
So, from these results, we can conclude that during the time that most people reading this blog have been investing, having a Democrat in office has been favorable.
However, since I just have the 2002 version of Siegel’s book, I wanted to check up on this and see how our Presidents have performed since then.
Update on Recent Presidents
Just as an example, I pulled up the Google Finance chart of the performance of the S&P500 index during the Clinton presidency. During his terms, the stock market went up 203%.
The same S&P500 chart for G.W Bush’s two terms is shown below. During his time in office, the market decreased 29% overall. However, he did have a nice run in the 2007 time frame!
Obama is fairly new to the Presidential office compared to the others. However, the performance of the S&P500 index during his term so far has shown a 44.18% increase (see chart below).
So, it appears that the trend of the markets performing better when Democrats are President vs. when Republicans are in Office has continued.
Will it continue to be this way? As far as this question goes, I don’t have any answers, as I am not one to ever try to time/predict the market. As a passive investor, I merely adjust my asset allocation to my targets on a monthly basis based on the fluctuations in the market.
Another thing I don’t have an answer to is why Democrats being President cause the markets to do better (at least in the past 60 years)? Because one would think they would do better with Republicans in Office! I need your help to shed some light on this.
How about you all? Why do you think the market has performed better when Democrats are in Office the past 60 years? Is it just residual policies being enacted from when Republicans were there? Is it because Republicans control the Senate/House during this time? Or, is it because Democrat policies enable lower and middle class people to have more money/spend more money?
Share your experiences by commenting below!
***Photo courtesy of http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3602/3366720659_b746789dfd.jpg
It’s hard to believe that it’s been more than 4 years since January of 2007. However, that’s how long it’s been since I first started learning what investing was for real through self-directed reading.
However, for the most part, if you are wondering anything about stocks, bonds, or any security for that matter, this is the book to go to!
Recommendation for purchasing the book (if you so desire)
If you’re interested in buying this book, I would recommend purchasing a cheap, used copy from Amazon. There are two editions available for purchase – 1) the 2007 edition and 2) the 2002 edition
.
Personally, I would buy the 2002 edition because it is only $0.48 vs. $23 for the newer edition. I seriously doubt that the added material is worth >$20 more in purchase price, because the 2002 version is already very good!
How about you all? Have you read Stocks for the Long Run by Siegel? What did you enjoy and what would you change? What are your favorite investment and/or personal finance books?
Share your experiences by commenting below!
————————————————————————————————————————
Welcome to My Personal Finance Journey! If you are new here, please read the “About” or “First-Time Visitor” pages to find out more about us. If you would like to receive free updates on articles like this by email, then sign up here or you can subscribe to the RSS feed. Also, check us out on Twitter or Facebook. Thanks for visiting! Keep on learning!
————————————————————————————————————————
Click here to enter my free giveaway for 2 copies of H&R Block At Home Premium Edition
How about you all? What steps would you take to improve your situation if you were homeless? Have you ever known any one that was homeless?
Share your experiences by commenting below!
Jacob’s Thoughts – Listed below are my random thoughts as I was reading this article.
***Photo courtesy of http://images.cdn.fotopedia.com/flickr-4307313294-hd.jpg