In a posting from last week (see link below), I mentioned that my application for a mortgage loan pre-approval was recently rejected. I also mentioned that it was fairly surprising when the rejection decision came back to me.
My Money Blog – Can Graduate Students Get Approved for a Home Mortgage Loan?
However, what I did not mention was that the reason that I was so surprised was due to the fact that the same lender had pre-qualified me for a loan several weeks prior.
From this experience, I learned that there obviously must be a big difference between getting pre-approved for a loan and getting pre-qualified. But – just what is that difference exactly? The answer to this question and the decision of which to pursue will be the subject of today’s post.
“Mortgages for Dummies” by Eric Tyson does a wonderful job exposing the differences between these two related, but significantly different, processes. If you are interested in learning more about the details of mortgages, I would highly recommend clicking the link below and picking up a cheap, used copy of this useful book on Amazon.com.
Mortgages For Dummies, 3rd Edition – Amazon.com
What does it mean to get pre-qualified for a home mortgage loan?
In Tyson’s book, he describes mortgage pre-qualification as, “potentially a waste of your time and money and may even be grossly misleading.” Well, he definitely seemed to hit the nail right on the head with this description, at least as far as I experienced this process.
Loan pre-qualification is essentially a “casual” agreement with the loan officer about approximately how much money they might be able to lend you, after quickly reviewing your financial situation. It is very fast and cheap. It usually only takes 15 minutes or less.
In the pre-qualification process, since the lender does not verify the facts about your financial situation, he/she/it is not bound by any contracts to loan you any of the money for which you get pre-qualified.
This sounds like a waste of time to me…
And, what’s more – the mortgage broker told me that in this day and age, pre-qualification is just as good as pre-approval. Talk about a trustworthy, knowledgeable professional!
What does it mean to get pre-approved for a home mortgage loan?
On the other hand, mortgage pre-approval is a much more serious process. In my mind, it is ALWAYS going to be the way to go in the future. The process involves the following steps be taken by the mortgage lender:
Keep on learning!
Jacob
To receive updates on topics such as this one as soon as they are published, click on the link below to subscribe to My Money Blog:
In the majority of the posts to date, I have limited the analysis of the different investment instruments that can be used to satisfy the different asset allocation components to index mutual funds. Please see link below for more details.
My Money Blog – Mutual Fund Posts
However, in one post back in January of this year, I introduced the idea of using ETFs (Exchange Traded Funds) to invest if you are just starting out and only have a relatively low amount of money ($100-$3000).
My Money Blog – Use ETFs to Begin Investing with $100
Not included in this article was an explanation of what an ETF exactly is and how they stack up against regular index mutual funds. These topics will be the subjects of today’s post.
Note: Even though there are both ETFs and mutual funds that are actively managed, we are going to only focus on the index version of each of these, since we have learned previously that actively managed funds do not outperform the market.
What exactly is an ETF?
According to Investopedia.com (see link below for more information), an ETF, or Exchange Traded Fund, is an investment instrument that is very similar to a mutual fund, but is traded like an individual stock.
When you purchase a share of an ETF, your money is pooled with other investors’ funds, which are then used to buy shares of numerous individuals stocks, in order to be representative of an index (such as the S&P500) of which the ETF seeks to track. In this way, an ETF is very similar to a mutual fund.
Investopedia.com – ETF Definition
However, the pricing of an ETF is set throughout the day by the market demand/supply (not based on Net Asset Value at the end of the day like a mutual fund price is calculated)
Comparison of Historical Performance
Before delving in to the detailed comparison of the characteristics of mutual funds and ETFs, let’s take a look at how an ETF and mutual fund that track the same index faired during the last year.
For this comparision, we will look at the two Vanguard.com instruments shown below:
As can be seen from this comparison, the only difference in return between the two instruments appears to be the 0.1% advantage that the ETF carries over the index mutual fund due to having a 0.1% lower expense ratio. Otherwise, the returns appear to be otherwise equal.
Comparison of Characterisitics of ETFs and Mutual Funds (Indexed)
The table below shows a comparison of the different attributes of index ETFs and mutual funds
Note: this table comes to us from page 256 of Jeremy Siegel’s “Stocks for the Long Run” (my investing bible). I would definitely suggest that you click on the link below and pick up a cheap used copy of this very useful book from Amazon.com.
Management
Shares of both ETFs and mutual funds can be bought that are managed in an index fashion. However, ETFs can be bought and sold throughout the trading day, similar to an individual stock.
Fees/Espense Ratios
Generally, ETFs have slightly lower fees than the corresponding index mutual fund. This can be seen in the example above. However, both index mutual funds and ETFs offerred from Vanguard have fees that are much lower than the industry average.
Trading Costs/Commissions
Typically, trading ETFs has involved paying regular brokerage commissions for trading (trading mutual funds of the brand in which you hold your account is free of commissions). However, according to a recent article and the Vanguard fee schedule link below, Vanguard has begun offering commision free ETF trading in-house. Definitely use this to your advantage!
Vanguard.com – ETF Commission Fees
Dividend Reinvestment
In Siegel’s book, he mentioned that ETFs do not offer dividend reinvestment. However, when I just opened a brokerage/ETF account with Vanguard.com this morning, there was an option that stated that they were now offering dividend reinvestment. Excellent! This is generally preffered for long term investing!
Tax Efficiency
Overall, both index mutual funds and ETFs are very tax efficient. However, ETFs are slightly better in the realm of taxes due to the fact that they generate fewer capital gains than mutual funds (mutual funds generate capital gains when the fund must sell holdings when individual fund investors sell/redeem their shares).
Note: this slightly advantage seen in tax efficiency for ETFs only applies to funds held in taxable accounts.
Price/Pricing Fluctuations
Before investigating this topic for this post, I tended to shy away from index ETFs because I expected that the ETF would not track its respective index as effectively as an index mutual fund. This was due to my belief that since an ETF can be traded all day long, it would therefore be subject to emotional overreactions (selling and buyin) of investors.
However, in reading more of Siegel’s book on the subject of ETFs, I discovered that ETFs actually track their respective indices very closely because insitutional/large investors can turn in shares of an index for the corresponding ETFs or exchange ETFs for their respective shares. In other words, arbitragers (investors taking advantage of price differentials) cause any price differential to disappear quickly. Thank goodness that those folks on Wall Street take care of that so I don’t have to worry about it!
Purchase Minimums
As I mentioned in the link about beginning to invest with ETFs, ETFs are much better for beginning investors because you only have to buy 1 share in order to get full diversification to the index that the ETF represents.
On the other hand, index mutual funds usually require a minimum investment of $3,000-$10,000 to buy a particular fund. One good thing though is that you do not have to maintain a balance minimum of $3000 in order to keep the fund.
Bottom Line
The key takeaway for me is that because Vanguard has started offering 1) dividend reinvestment and 2) commission free ETF trading, I am going to now use both Vanguard ETFs and mutual funds (index, of course). ETFs will fit well in my taxable Vanguard account in situations when I cannot afford the $3000 minimum to purchase a new mutual fund, but still want exposure to a certain asset class in order to balance out my asset allocation %’s.
So, bottom line is that you should probably use both ETFs and mutual funds, keeping the caveats shown below in mind.
You should only use mutual funds (stay away from ETFs) if you know you are subject to easy emotional reactions when the market either goes up or down. Since mutual funds do not fluctuate in price throughout the entire day, you will be less likely to over-react and sell/buy at inappropriate times.
You should only use ETFs (stay away from mutual funds) if you like to use leverage/margins, hedge your investments by selling ETFs short, and enjoy moving quickly in and out of your investments (I do not recommend this approach).
Keep on learning!
Jacob
To receive updates on topics such as this one as soon as they are published, click on the link below to subscribe to My Money Blog:
As many of you all know, I am currently saving up money for a down payment and attempting to obtain a home mortgage loan in preparation for closing on the purchase of a condo/townhouse/house this fall when I begin graduate school.
Why do I want to buy a house/condo/townhouse instead of renting?
Since I will be in graduate school for 4-5 years, I would like to be building up some kind of equity during this time period, instead of just wasting money with rent payments. Additionally, I want to try to follow the rule of thumb that it is better to buy your housing if you plan to be in the property for 3-5 years or longer.
Note: in a future post, I am planning to create a rent vs. buy calculator spreadsheet for everyone to use.
From a previous post (see link below), I was able to calculate that the loan amount I can afford is ~$95,000.
My Money Blog – How Much of a Mortgage Loan Can I Afford?
While I am certain that with my income right now, I can get approved for a home loan, I was not really sure if I would be able to gain approval for a home loan this fall, given that my income will be drastically less ($23,000 per year) during graduate school.
However, approximately 1 month ago, I went ahead and applied for pre-approval of a home mortgage loan, using a mortgage broker that was recommended by both the real estate agent and a friend who is also in graduate school.
I filled out all of the forms, provided tax statements, proof of income, proof of 2 years of employment, total net worth calculations, and account statements from where my various investment instruments are located.
Everything seemed to be going well, and the mortgage broker calculated that he should attempt to pre-approve me for a $125,000 FHA home loan (3.5% down payment minimum). However, when my application was submitted, the mortgage underwriter could not approve it due to the following reasons:
Interestingly enough, it was never mentioned that my application was denied due to the normal reasons you hear about, such as insufficient credit or lack of income or liquidity.
He said that I would need a non-occupant to cosign the mortgage loan with me in order to get approved.
Conclusion
While it may be possible for a graduate student to obtain a home mortgage loan as the sole borrower, I definitely was not able to, given the income I will be receiving. It really seemed to throw off the mortgage lenders that I was going to be a paid student, as I am guessing they don’t receive too many of those applications.
In order to qualify for a home mortgage, you will most likely have to have a co-signer/co-borrower, even with great credit and a sizable net worth.
Keep on learning!
Jacob
To receive updates on topics such as this one as soon as they are published, click on the link below to subscribe to My Money Blog:
From April 7th (when the last portfolio update was published – see link below for more information) to May 4th, the S&P 500 index went down 1.33%.
My Money Blog – April 2010 Portfolio and Net Worth
During that time period, my net worth increased 5.24%. I have now achieved the following financial goals in 2010:
Currently, 31% of my net worth is invested in fixed income instruments (cash or bond funds), and 69% is invested in equity. This is undoubtedly off of my targets of 25% and 75%, respectively, for these categories. The cash portion of my net worth has increased significantly since I am building up funds for a down payment for the condo I want to purchase this fall.
While the overall percentages for these categories are not ideal, a detailed look (table below) at the allocation breakdown reveals the real story and provides for better analysis of the current state.
Remember: a red flag goes off if your current % allocation in a category is greater than +/- 5% off of the target allocation.
% Cash (money market target 5%) 15%
% non-inflat Bond Funds (target 15%) 15%
% TIPS Bonds (target 5%) 0%
% International Equity (Target 11%) 12%
% International Emerging Markets (Target 11%) 7%
% Domestic Large Cap (Target 8%) 20%
% Domestic Small Cap (Target 9%) 10%
% Domestic Small Cap Value (Target 13%) 8%
% Domestic Large Cap Value (Target 13%) 6%
% REIT (target 10%) 6%
The components of my portfolio highlighted in red above are outside of the 5% safety band, and therefore, need to be analyzed for reallocation. Unfortunately, due to my current situation of saving up money for a mortgage down payment, it may just not be possible to satisfy all requirements at this time.
Note: as mentioned before, I currently have a VERY large percentage of my portfolio in Domestic Large Cap stocks. This is due to the fact that I was contributing 100% of my 401k contributions purchase S&P500 index fund shares for 1.5 years.
Towards the end of March, I began moving money from the S&P500 fund to a domestic small cap fund in my 401k. This progress can be seen by the fact that the domestic small cap funds now make up 10% of my net worth, up from 6% at the beginning of March. Since the proportion has now passed my domestic small cap allocation target of 9%, I will stop this transfer activity.
My next moves for the May/June time frame will be to do the following:
Jacob
To receive updates on topics such as this one as soon as they are published, click on the link below to subscribe to My Money Blog:
In previous posts, I have covered the following topics related to mortgage payments and asset allocation:
However, in these posts, I did not include exactly how the mortgage payments (and resulting home equity that is built) should fit in to your overall asset allocation target/strategy. This will be the subject of today’s posting.
To try to shed some light on this topic, let’s first see what the financial advisors do to handle this question. We will then see how we need to adapt their strategy since we have no restrictions with what we do.
How do financial professionals handle the asset allocation strategy with home equity?
Through an examination of the opinions of the financial press (see three links below), I discovered that there are basically three “camps” when it comes to opinions on how home equity should be treated when it comes to figuring out your overall asset allocation.
1) Not including home equity in the target asset allocation percentages at all.
This approach is generally taken because real estate values/equity are difficult to determine exactly and because most of the time, it is not possible to adjust your allocation %’s in real estate because you cannot simply leave a house for another one.
2) Not including home equity in asset allocation percentages unless it is an investment property (so not including including your primary residence).
This approach of excluding your primary residence from your asset allocation decision making is taken because of the fact that you NEED a place to live, and you cannot simply exchange your home for shares of a mutual fund if your allocation %’s change.
3) Include all residences, investment properties, and REIT investments as a “real estate” category in your asset allocation strategy.
This approach is generally taken to have a conservative strategy that ensures that all assets are captured. However, since it is a little harder to follow, it is generally the least popular strategy.
MyMoneyBlog – Home Equity in Asset Allocation
BusinessWeek.com – Home Equity in Asset Allocation?
Investment News – Including Home Equity in Asset Allocation
Which approach will I take?
I believe that for my needs, situation, and investment style, I am going to choose to follow Approach #1 – not including my future home equity in the property I am planning to purchase this fall – with a slight adjustment.
Why is this exactly?
In short, home equity in a single house cannot be considered exposure to real estate because it is not diversified enough.
A passage on pages 282-285 of one of my favorite asset allocation books titled, “What Wall Street Doesn’t Want You to Know,” by Larry Swedroe does a great job of breaking this down in to terms the layperson can understand.
In the book, Swedroe describes that your home is clearly real estate.
However, it is very undiversified real estate in the following ways:
So, because the home you live in is very undiversified and have trust deeds associated with it, counting it towards the real estate portion of your overall asset allocation would be as foolish as a Pfizer executive counting a large quantity of Pfizer stock as their sole exposure to large cap US asset class. They are really not diversified one bit.
Since owning even one share of an index real estate investment mutual fund, such as a REIT that Vanguard, gives you broad exposure to all types of real estate across many different regions, this should be the route that is chosen to represent the real estate portion of your asset allocation picture.
So, how will I treat/consider my home purchase since I am not including it in my asset allocation mix?
Just to recap – in my mind, I want to purchase a home vs. rent one for the following reasons:
On a similar note, I would want to invest in additional real estate properties to take advantage of tax benefits of home ownership, such as being excluded from paying capital gains on profit from selling the property (described in previous post at link above).
Given the considerations above, here’s the way I will treat home equity:
So, I hope this investigation/discussion helps guide you through some of the tough decisions you will have to make regarding how you will treat home ownership. As always, please let me know if you have any questions.
Keep on learning!
Jacob
To receive updates on topics such as this one as soon as they are published, click on the link below to subscribe to My Money Blog:
In a previous post (see link below), I discussed several techniques/tips that you can use to get a feel for how much of a home loan you can afford.
My Money Blog – How Much House Can I Afford?
However, this post was written with the assumption that you have the ability to be approved for the home loan.
Since not everyone is fortunate enough to fall under this category, I figured it would be a good idea to devote a post to explaining the various ways to improve your chances of being approved for the quantity of home mortgage or reverse mortgage you desire.
Ways to Improve Your Changes of Being Approved for a Home Loan
I hope these tips help, and as always, please let me know if you have any questions.
Keep on learning!
Jacob
To receive updates on topics such as this one as soon as they are published, click on the link below to subscribe to My Money Blog:
It is such a difficult and loaded question isn’t it? But, just how much of a house can you afford?
Since this is one of the first questions that you have to answer when you begin your quest for home ownership, I figured I would investigate this matter to try to internalize it, and hopefully, help all of you in the process!
Start With Your Monthly Income
As you might have guessed, the best place to start finding an answer to this question is your current monthly income (gross – before taxes). The approximate value of the mortgage payment you can comfortably afford (allows room for monthly debt and living expenses) is 28% of your monthly gross income.
Calculate the Mortgage Amount that You Can Comfortably Afford
To assist you in calculating the amount of a mortgage that you can afford, I created the Google Docs spreadsheet at the link below.
Google Docs – How Much Mortgage Can You Comfortably Afford?
After clicking on the link, save a copy on of the spreadsheet on your hard drive so that you can edit it. Next, enter the following details according to your specific situation, or just leave them as the default values.
For my specific situation, in graduate school this fall, I will be making $23,000 per year from my research assistantship (monthly gross income of $1917). This means that I can afford a mortgage payment of $537 per month, without assistance from family. Very nice!
By running the Solver calculation as described above, Excel tells me that I should be looking for a home mortgage loan of no more than $95,535 so that I can still live comfortable. This seems reasonable for sure!
Now, remember, the mortgage payment will include four components – mortgage interest, principal, homeowners insurance, and real estate taxes. Additionally, the mortgage amount does not include the down payment on the house. Keep these things in mind as we are discussing this topic.
How Much of Mortgage Can You Qualify, or be Approved, For?
For this section, I have to start by explaining that mortgage brokers and real estate agents are almost always compensated on a % basis.
And, as such, they financially benefit by putting you in a more expensive house – and even a one that is more expensive than you can afford. Of course, this is just another reason why you want to make sure you choose carefully when selecting professional help. However, what are the financial ramifications of this, and how do you determine the biggest house that you can possibly qualify for?
So, while the 28% rule described above is the suggested mortgage amount that you can afford comfortably, as it turns out, mortgage lenders can actually lend you money such that your total monthly mortgage payment + other consumer debt equals 40% of your gross monthly income. Note: this is just debt – it does not include living expenses (food, etc).
To assist you in determining the loan amount that you can qualify for, I created the Google Docs spreadsheet at the link below. At a high level, it works by calculating the loan amount you can obtain so that the monthly loan payment added to your existing debt is equal to 40% of your monthly gross income.
Google Docs – How Much of a Home Mortgage Can You Obtain?
To use it, perform the following steps:
Jacob
To receive updates on topics such as this one as soon as they are published, click on the link below to subscribe to My Money Blog:
We hear the catchy jingles all of the time on the radio from Bank of America, Wachovia, and others. So, I figured it was about time to devote a blog post to evaluating these programs in general and performing a comparison to see which program comes out ahead!
Let’s get started.
Comparison of Bank Savings Programs
Now that we have the specifics of the details of each program, let’s now go through a scenario to see which program comes out to be a better deal. To view the scenario analysis, click on the Google Docs link below to access the spreadsheet I created.
Google Docs – Comparison of Bank Savings Programs
In this analysis, we’ll assume that a person, Joe, makes one purchase every day for two years in $0.01 increments between $1 and $2. We will then analyze the follow characteristics that would result at the end of the two year period using Bank of America’s Keep the Change program and then using Wachovia’s Way to Save program
1) The total account value
2) The total amount of free money (either from interest or matched by the programs) the Joe would receive.
Note: These calculations do not include the regular interest rate received as part of the savings account used. However, promotional interest rates are included.
By examining the spreadsheet’s calculations, we see that Bank of America’s Keep the Change program yields approximately 3X more free money ($65 vs. $19 with Wachovia’s Way to Save program), mainly resulting from the 100% match during the 1st 3 months that the account is open.
However, we also see that the total savings account value is approximately 1.7X greater with Wachovia’s program than with Bank of America’s. This is mainly due to the $1 increments that are transferred from your checking account no matter what value purchase you make.
Do I Use These Programs?
The short answer to this is “no.” I do not use these types of programs for several reasons.
Will I Start Using These Programs After Doing This Analysis?
The short answer to this question, unfortunately, is also “no.” By running a quick calculation, I found out that by using my cash back credit cards, I would get $21 in free money simply by making the 2 years of purchases in the spreadsheet. This fact, along with the other resignations described above, are not, in my opinion, worth the hassle of using a different debit card for all of my purchases.
Key Takeaway
After studying these more in-depth, I definitely have a greater appreciation for how they work. Even though they are not the best fit for my situation, I am convinced that they are VERY useful for many people. I will keep them in mind as a option for recommending to friends that are looking for a good savings instrument.
Keep on learning!
Jacob
To receive updates on topics such as this one as soon as they are published, click on the link below to subscribe to My Money Blog:
In my opinion, there are only four instruments remaining accessible to the average citizen that provide the opportunity for significant tax savings/advantages. These four instruments are listed below:
Note: While trusts can be a very effective shield against Uncle Sam’s “claw” reaching in your wallet, they are generally only used by wealthy people. As such, they will be the subject of a future post.
As you can see, most of the instruments above have been discussed in previous posts. However, I have yet to describe all of the fantastic tax advantages that come from owning your own home that are definitely NOT available to us as renters. This will be the topic of today’s post.
So, just what are the tax benefits of home ownership? As it turns out, there are two categories of benefits – short term and long term. Let’s look at the short-term benefits first.
Short Term Tax Benefits of Homeownership
The main short term tax benefit associated with purchasing a home relates to the mortgage “points,” or pre-paid interest, that is paid at the time of closing on a home mortgage loan. These can be deducted from your taxable income the year that you first get your mortgage.
In addition, you can also obtain tax credits for “green” building/home improvement initiatives, such as the current 2011 home improvement tax credit.
Long Term Tax Benefits of Homeownership
So, let’s take a look at how much these benefits would save you on a 15 or 30 year fixed rate mortgage. To investigate this, we’ll take the mortgage amortization schedule that we created in a previous post (see link below), and adapt it slightly to demonstrate the savings in taxes that are available.
Keep on learning!
Jacob
To receive updates on topics such as this one as soon as they are published, click on the link below to subscribe to My Money Blog:
When I updated my financial goals (see link below) on 7-April-2010, I mentioned that one of my short term goals was to focus more on selling off my remaining individual stocks because 1) they were purchased either before I came to the realization that it is foolish to invest large amounts of money in individual stocks or 2) they were purchased as a learning tool by means of “play money” (to learn what play money is, see the post at the following link, My Money Blog – Play Money), and I am no longer monitoring and/or learning from them.
My Money Blog – Financial Goals
In accordance with my goal, this past Thursday, I sold off all of my remaining individual stock holdings in my Zecco.com and Sogotrade.com accords.
How did I fare on these holdings?
Well, I figure that since when tax time rolls around next year, I will have to calculate my “gain” on these stock sells anyway. So, might as well do it now so that you all can see how bad individual stocks are as an investment for an individual investor (Granted, I am no full time stock researcher. But, this is my biased opinion).
The link below contains a spreadsheet where I calculated my returns for the 10 stocks I sold on 4/7/2010.
Google Docs – 2010 Individual Stock Gains (Losses)
As you can see in the spreadsheet (green highlighted cells), my total return for holding these stocks from 8/22/2006 through 4/7/2010 was a loss of $26.20, or a loss of 2.8%. Add on top of this the commissions I paid to buy and sell the stock and any capital gains taxes that would be involved, and this makes for one truly awesome performance right!?
To complete the picture, let’s take a quick look at how the market did in this period. During this time, the S&P500 index did not perform well at all; it began at 1304 and ended at 1217, or a loss of approximately 7%. So, the good news is that I did beat the market performance during this time! woohoo! I just did better than 70% of the Wall Street professionals!
However, once we employ the power of dollar cost averaging (buy the same dollar value – I used buying $100 of shares of the S&P500 fund as an example in my spreadsheet – of a mutual fund each month as is done automatically with 401k accounts), we obtain a return of positive 3.6% (shown in yellow highlighted cells). This is quite amazing!
So, let me get this straight. We see a higher return by simply having your mutual fund account buy a set dollar value each month in an index mutual fund. You don’t have to look at it, know what’s going on in the market, worry about your asset allocation percentages, perform dollar value averaging, or do anything for that matter! And, you will get a higher return than I did for all of the effort and money I put in to stock newsletters, books, etc.
Genius right? Hardly. In fact, it’s widely known in the asset allocation/index mutual fund world that your investing should not be exciting. It should be easy, boring, and not a good topic to bring up at parties. However, it takes great discipline to do this.
Clearly, if I had mastered this discipline 3-4 years ago, I would not be writing this post! Live and learn right?
Side note: Recently, while reading the book by author Larry E. Swedroe titled “The Only Guide to a Winning Investment Strategy You’ll Ever Need,” I came across the interesting fact below about the efficiency of markets in responding to changes in information (in other words, further reinforcing the idea that it is very hard to make superior returns investing in individual stocks):
Keep on learning!
Jacob
To receive updates on topics such as this one as soon as they are published, click on the link below to subscribe to My Money Blog: